SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Les H who wrote (5942)4/18/2001 10:50:35 AM
From: Paul Shread  Respond to of 52237
 
I agree that breakaway gaps don't need to be filled; point well taken. My big problem was that gap at the very bottom, from 1638-1700, that didn't fill. Just seems kind of odd on the only pass through that area.



To: Les H who wrote (5942)4/18/2001 10:56:33 AM
From: JRI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
Les...how do view all these gap up days on this rally.....If we are able to rally intra-day today, that will make, by my count, the 3rd day in which intra-day was strongly positive....still, take away the gaps, and this move hasn't been near as large..

Does that make you consider at all the strength of this rally, or whether it may end something soon..



To: Les H who wrote (5942)4/18/2001 7:34:49 PM
From: Square_Dealings  Respond to of 52237
 
Look at the big doji on that 200dma -g-. So far so good.

askresearch.com

M.



To: Les H who wrote (5942)4/18/2001 11:01:48 PM
From: isopatch  Respond to of 52237
 
Les. Good point. When accompanied by hi vol

the answer is yes, IMO. A breakaway gap does not have to be filled.

Iso