SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tommaso who wrote (90182)4/18/2001 2:44:57 PM
From: Ronald J. Clark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
AGA +64B

Message 15682018



To: Tommaso who wrote (90182)4/18/2001 2:47:46 PM
From: Roebear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Tommaso,
Bingo, right answer!

One difference between now and then is the cultural difference. Credit is very easy these days and folks are quite used to living on it, whereas in the 20's and 30's consumer credit was a recent phenomena prone to consumer "guilt" panic. It was in those days largely a hard currency climate and credit also had a bit of a seamy reputation to it. Kind of like Daytrading these days, ggg.

Hence, I find it debatable whether a goosing of the economy via credit and liquiditry will allow enough time for a recovery of profits by enough of the economy to make a difference. I WILL however, be surprised if some inflation does not surface sometime in the next six months, whether by stagflation or a credit fueled demand economy. The consequences of an overly strong dollar may be too much to bear.

It doesn't seem possible that we can export our inflation and import our deflation through this time as we have for a number of years. Of course, I've been wrong before, but that's how I'll play it for now.

Best,

Roebear



To: Tommaso who wrote (90182)4/19/2001 9:58:18 AM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
Here's a good account of where rate cuts have failed in the past:

zealllc.com