SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Voltaire who wrote (35984)4/18/2001 7:50:23 PM
From: Venkie  Respond to of 65232
 
10 % return today...hell I should be back to parr in no time and I don't hv to worry about cap gains.
All I hv to say is...thank you God and Yafuc%%hooooooooooooooooooo.
My basket is Brcm..Rbak..Cree...Brcd..will add Newp and Sebl/Beas/..ect.ect



To: Voltaire who wrote (35984)4/18/2001 8:18:22 PM
From: t2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
V, So many skeptics about this rally. I have been predicting an explosive move for the Nasdaq for a week. There is just too many factors at work.

I still think the shorting mania is still intact; combine that with good mutual fund cash levels and things look pretty good for continued rapid move up.
Fidelity light on technology and I bet many other big funds are as well. Too much institutional money still to flow into techs. I wish they had not cut rates today---believe the gains would have been pretty good with even without the rate cut. A cut tomorrow would have even been better but I am not complaining.

Think tech stocks are the place to be. Too many factors at work.
Some shorts' TA indicated shorting at 1950 range on the Nasdaq and now they are going to higher levels.

I have been saying that the Nasdaq would cut through 2000 like a hot knife through butter. Mid 2000s and it stabilizes.

Just glad there are so many skeptics. The busiest threads still have the most bearish people on it. That is such a good contrarian indicator..to me. Just check on the SI homepage and take a look at the "clown free" or whatever it is called. That is where I find the most amusing posts..these guys are in denial. I got banned from it because I thought 2100 was an easy target due to the shorting mania. LOL.

Good Luck.



To: Voltaire who wrote (35984)4/18/2001 9:03:05 PM
From: J Krnjeu  Respond to of 65232
 
Hello Voltaire,

Hope everyone is good. I haven't been able to follow the porch much lately.

Do you still have RMBS or have you sold it and brought NEWP.
There is a great deal of talk about NEWP on the porch lately.

Good luck to all.

Thank You
JK



To: Voltaire who wrote (35984)4/19/2001 12:02:05 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Is the Bear Dead?
_________________________________________________

Wednesday April 18, 7:20 pm Eastern Time
TheStandard.com

By Eric J. Savitz

<<Wednesday's wild rally on Wall Street certainly was a nice surprise -- the Nasdaq soared more than 8 percent, and our own Industry Standard 100 index galloped ahead more than 10 percent. But the action -- and the surprise Fed rate cut that spurred the move -- raise as many questions as they answer.


First, investors are asking whether the rally is for real. To some observers, Wednesday's rise is reminiscent of the short-lived January rally, which kicked off Jan. 3, as the Fed made the first of this year's four rate cuts. On that day, the Nasdaq rallied more than 324 points, or 14.2 percent, to 2616.69. People were feeling pretty good about stocks that afternoon, too.

Second, there's the odd combination of factors that had the market in rally mode. Stocks were rallying broadly Wednesday morning even before the Fed made its move, primarily due to some modestly optimistic comments from Intel late Tuesday about the outlook for the second half of the year. Then the Fed came in with its surprise rate cut, warning, "The persistent erosion of current and expected profitability in combination with rising uncertainty about the business outlook seems poised to dampen capital spending going forward," as well as of slower growth abroad.

So while Intel might see better times ahead, the Fed apparently did not. Which raises question No. 2B: Does the Fed know something we don't know? Is there new evidence of a recession that will be revealed in upcoming economic data?

Third, there's the question of what the Fed is likely to do at its next regularly scheduled meeting, in mid-May. In short, some observers are wondering, did the Fed kick in an extra rate cut -- or did it simply give us the expected mid-May reduction a few weeks earlier? And if the markets begin to suspect that the Fed would move more modestly -- or not at all -- in May, could stock prices hold up?

Finally, there is the question of whether the ongoing rate cuts actually solve the over-capacity problems that continue to plague technology stocks. In other words, if we assume for the moment that we have in fact hit the bottom for tech stocks -- and not every one thinks so -- then will the rate cuts pull us out of the hole?

Alas, there are more questions than answers.

The bearish camp thinks that we're repeating what happened in January, that this is simply one more example of a classic bear rally, short and sharp.

Fred Hickey, who writes the High Tech Strategist, a Nashua, N.H.-based newsletter, remains unrepentantly negative. Valuations, he says, remain "ridiculous beyond belief." He's particularly struck by the paradox of the two stories moving the markets Wednesday.

Hickey notes, "What's amazing here is that the market was reacting to the fact that [investors] thought the market was improving -- but if that were true, the Fed would not have had to come in with another desperate rate cut."

The Fed, he contends, seems to be a little panicked. "The Fed is so desperate that they have to do things in the middle of the morning on an options-expiration day, clearly trying to manipulate the stock market," Hickey says. "We haven't learned anything. There are no signs of a bottom here. If we were at a bottom, investors wouldn't be throwing money at the market like this."

Also cautious is Carl Weinberg, an economist with High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, N.Y. Weinberg warns that "tech stocks clearly have a problem" even after the surprise rate cut. He contends that it would be unlikely to see the tech sector stage an extended recovery right now.

"We are unlikely to have a resurgence, not in the near term," Weinberg says. "There's still over-capacity and over-investment in the sector." And lower rates, he says, are not going to cure those particular ills.

Still, some on the Street are feeling more optimistic Wednesday afternoon. Mat Johnson, growth stock strategist at Thomas Weisel Partners, notes that in recent weeks, investors have been reacting less and less to negative earnings news -- that investors have long since priced into stock prices a very weak first half. "What's still uncertain," he says, "is whether investors can continue to handle a relatively bad earnings season and take solace from the Fed."

Johnson thinks that lower rates lay the ground work for better times later. For instance, reduced rates tend to benefit financial services companies, which happen to be among the largest buyers of technology goods and services. "It bodes well for enterprise software and storage," he says.

But he does have a caution to offer. Even with Wednesday's cut, the consensus view is that the Fed will cut again in May. Johnson warns that investors are going to be disappointed if the Fed goes into fine-tuning mode and cuts by only 25 basis points at the May meeting."

Brian Belski, fundamental market strategist at U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray in Minneapolis, is bullish on stocks for the long haul, but he expects stocks to spend the next few quarters going sideways.

"We need to get used to companies not growing at the rate they once did," Belski says. "Yes, the climate is better, but no, we're not off to the races."

He suggests that investors look at tech stocks at the bottom of the food chain -- chip makers and semiconductor equipment companies such as Advanced Micro Devices, Micron Technology and Applied Materials, as well as computer makers such as Dell and IBM.

Greg McClenon, director of research at Hotove Pomeranz, a San Francisco-based brokerage firm, is looking in the same places as Belski. The personal computer industry, he says, has largely cleaned up its inventory problems, and the chip industry is right behind. But he expects problems to linger for several more quarters in the communications equipment business, where sales are tied to the buying plans of slow moving telecom service providers.

Finally, if you are looking for a theory on why the Fed moved so suddenly, McClenon has one.

"I think we're in a recession and have been for a couple of months," he says. "Not a very long one, not a very deep one, but the underpinnings are all there. We had this large bubble of paper wealth that people were spending -- that bubble has burst, and we have to let that work through the system.">>



To: Voltaire who wrote (35984)4/19/2001 6:42:55 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
The Last Days of Net Mania -- Mark Andreessen's Loudcloud...
____________________________________________
APRIL 16, 2001
BusinessWeek.com

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The Last Days of Net Mania

Marc Andreessen was there when the dot-com boom began. His IPO for Loudcloud marks its end
Internet legend Marc L. Andreessen is running on adrenaline. It's the late afternoon of Mar. 8, and he has just completed a backbreaking, initial public offering road show that landed him in 70 meetings in 16 days with moneymen scattered across North America and Europe. Andreessen has been trying to wow institutional investors with his 18-month-old Internet startup, Loudcloud Inc. (LDCL ) Now he's hunkered down with a handful of Loudcloud associates in a sixth-floor conference room at investment bank Morgan Stanley Dean Witter's (MWD ) Manhattan headquarters. Outside, dark clouds engulf New York's steel towers. But the road-weary Andreessen and his pals have their own storm to contend with.

Loudcloud is going public at the worst possible moment. A day earlier, Web portal Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO ) sent the market reeling by announcing a massive sales shortfall. Today, chipmaker Intel Corp. (INTC ) warns it will badly miss first-quarter revenues and will cut 5,000 jobs. The Nasdaq Composite Index sheds 55 points and is nearing a 26-month low. The cratering conditions are ominous for the startup, which runs complex Web sites for businesses. When Loudcloud first filed to go public 164 days earlier, it was valued at $1.15 billion, in spite of losing $107 million on only $6 million in revenues in the three quarters ended Oct. 31. At the most recent price range of $6 to $6.50 a share, it would be worth just $440 million. Even at the new price, the salespeople from Morgan Stanley and co-underwriter Goldman, Sachs & Co. (GS ) aren't having an easy time selling all the IPO shares to institutional investors. Finally, at 5 p.m., they finish. The thrift-store price: $6 a share.

There's no whooping it up. Somebody rolls up a cart loaded with Taittinger champagne, soda, and cookies. But everybody is too busy to take a break. The cart is gone by the time the deal is done. Andreessen, who is Loudcloud's chairman, grabs a moment alone in a banker's office. On a phone call to a reporter, he sounds chipper in spite of the gloomy outcome. "We raised the money!" he nearly shouts. "We needed to raise it. We got it done." He's relieved. It's over. It's the end of what must have seemed, at times, like the IPO from hell.

Stepping back, this bittersweet moment for Andreessen could mark the end of an era for Wall Street and for the Internet bonanza. And in one of life's little ironies, it's fitting that Andreessen is the one to witness its passing. It was his first company, Netscape Communications Corp., with a browser elegant in its simplicity, that opened up the potential of the World Wide Web. When Netscape went public in 1995--with zero profits, but lots of promise--its stock rose 107%, whetting appetites for more Net IPOs. Over the next five years, some 420 Web companies would go public before Net mania turned into Net aversion. Many had hoped that Andreessen's cachet could get things going again. Instead, it seems likely that Andreessen has just presided over the last of the old, Internet-style IPOs. "There's no question the whole mind-set of businesses and investors has changed. An era has ended. Loudcloud confirms it," says John H. Freeman, a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley.

RACING THE CLOCK. In fact, Loudcloud's drubbing has all but slammed the door for other Internet offerings. And even when conditions improve again, it's unlikely investors will bet their money on long-shot Net companies without a whiff of profits. Since Loudcloud's Mar. 9 IPO, no tech firm has filed an application to go public. Meanwhile, 12 Net firms have withdrawn their IPO paperwork. Still waiting nervously in queue: WebGain, Instinet, and eRoom. "If Andreessen can't do it, nobody can," says Sheldon Laube, CEO of CenterBeam Inc., which provides computers and Net connections for small businesses.

It's a disappointing turn of events for the 29-year-old Andreessen. Today, just four weeks after going public at the nadir of the steepest sell-off in Nasdaq history, the news for Loudcloud isn't improving. Goldman Sachs spent at least three days propping up Loudcloud's stock price by buying millions of shares, according to Scott Ryles, CEO of Epoch Partners, a secondary underwriter. Goldman declined to comment. The stock still sank to a low of $3.88. It has since drifted back to $4.53.

Now Andreessen's once-promising startup is in a race to build revenues and profits before it runs out of money. Loudcloud has about $225 million in the bank after raising $150 million in its IPO, but it's burning through about $10 million per month. Although Loudcloud has booked $120 million in contracts for the next two years and boasts blue-chip customers such as Ford (F ), News Corp. (NWS ), and Nike (NKE ), many of its 46 customers are startups and several are in trouble. One, Scudder Weisel Capital, announced on Mar. 29 that it will fold. Even the analysts for Loudcloud underwriter Goldman Sachs don't expect Loudcloud to break even until sometime in early 2003. Unless the company can ratchet down its burn rate or sell more stock, it might not survive that long.

Loudcloud's a brand-new sort of business. Operating out of leased data centers with leased computers, it provides super-reliable Web sites for everything from media outfits to e-tailers. And it does it fast. Loudcloud's secret sauce is a layer of software, Opsware, which quickly integrates e-business software programs made by different companies--from Oracle's database to Vignette's software for handling Web pages. That way, Loudcloud can manage its customers' Web operations, updating and expanding as needed.

Living conditions are harsh, though. Other small-fry like Logictier and Totality offer similar services, but the real threat comes from tech behemoths such as EDS Corp. (EDS ) and IBM Global Services and an up-and-coming powerhouse, Exodus Communications (EXDS ). The bigs offer corporations the option of handing over the keys to their information systems to proven and trusted service providers. Companies have been slow to turn over their Web sites to upstarts like Loudcloud. More than 500 Web hosters have sprouted up over the last few years, but analysts expect up to 60% of them to fail by this time next year. "Loudcloud has really had difficulty reconciling its business with the fact that the market for Web hosting is disintegrating so quickly," says David B. Yoffie, a professor at Harvard Business School.

DEFYING THE ODDS. If Loudcloud fails, the damage to Andreessen's reputation could be considerable. In his first business foray out from under the wings of past mentors, Netscape co-founder James H. Clark and former Netscape CEO James L. Barksdale, Andreessen is determined to build a company that doesn't end up like Netscape--which, he says, Microsoft Corp. (MSFT ) turned into a "smoking crater in the ground." An avid reader of business history and strategy, Andreessen is driven by Netscape's fate and his desire to build a long-standing business success. Should Loudcloud emerge as a winner, Andreessen will cement his status as a visionary. If not, the Internet's wunderkind could be a has-been at the tender age of 30.

What happened? Andreessen and CEO Benjamin A. Horowitz created a company in one business environment, and when the world changed, Loudcloud didn't. The basic problem is that Loudcloud's business is so capital intensive. The company charges customers for three months of service up front and a monthly fee thereafter, but it has to spend its own money first on engineering the software and getting customers set up. At the same time, the company decided to delay reaching profitability, instead spending money aggressively to grow as quickly as possible. This plan may have seemed smart in earlier Internet days, but in a world where money is hard to get and dot-com customers are vaporizing, it no longer looks like a winning formula. Yet they kept plunging ahead as if they could defy the IPO odds.

Andreessen bristles at the suggestion that he should have seen the warning signs and reined in spending sooner. He says he has no regrets about going public when he did. "People keep forgetting, there was no way to tell what the market would do," he fumes, his face turning red. "As you know, it's impossible to make decisions in hindsight."

Whether Loudcloud succeeds or fails, it will have been a remarkable journey filled with big money, larger-than-life reputations, a cast of hundreds, arrogance, pathos, and intrigue. BusinessWeek gained exclusive access to the company's odyssey, sitting in on dozens of meetings and conducting 100-plus interviews in and around the company. Here's Loudcloud's tale:

SECRET MEETINGS
It's late in the summer of 1999, six months after America Online (AOL ) acquired Netscape. Andreessen, Horowitz, and fellow Netscape alums Timothy A. Howes and In Sik Rhee are itching to leave their employer and strike out on their own. The market is booming. The Nasdaq is still six months away from topping out above 5,000 points, and a stunning 253 Net companies will go public in the year. Valuations of dot-coms such as Yahoo! are poised to surpass established competitors like Walt Disney Co. (DIS )

Still employed by AOL, the quartet begins exploring e-business ideas. To keep the AOL brass from finding out, they all sign up for non-AOL e-mail. Ducking out for clandestine meals at places like Late for the Train near their Mountain View (Calif.) offices, they knock around business ideas, but none catch fire. Knowing that whatever their idea will be they'll need a Web site, Rhee and Howes set out to build the software that will assure their site can handle any volume of visitors without crashing.

Within days, the idea hits them: Building a fail-safe foundation isn't a problem they have to overcome on their way to creating their business. It is their business. They run fail-safe computing systems for others. By late September, they all quit AOL and are sketching out a business plan under the towering Redwood trees in the yard of Andreessen's Palo Alto (Calif.) home. They are back in the startup business.

A CONFIDENT CHIEF
It's a year later. Loudcloud is up and running, and it confidently files its paperwork to go public. One blazing hot afternoon, Andreessen hops into his silver, convertible Mercedes SL500 for the four-block jaunt from his Sunnyvale offices to Hobee's restaurant for a late breakfast. This IPO plan is iffy, considering that the company has racked up less than $2 million in sales. Internet stocks are under fire to show profits--money-losers like Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN ) and Priceline.com Inc. (PCLN ) are off 52-week highs by 79% and 95%, respectively.

Why even go public when the market has gone sour? It's a no-brainer, says Andreessen. Loudcloud is in a capital-intensive business and will need the money to stay on its ambitious growth trajectory. Equally important, Loudcloud wants the credibility of being a public company to help it win corporate contracts. "Customers are just more comfortable working with public companies," Andreessen explains.

What really worries him is not a down market but the possibility that Loudcloud's IPO will be too much of a good thing. His fear is that its stock will rocket and that it will be difficult to meet expectations. He had learned at Netscape that the ensuing commotion can make employees lose sight of the task at hand. "When your stock goes up like that, you start to believe the hype. You begin to think you're as wonderful as everyone says," explains Andreessen. "It makes going out in a down market much more attractive." Andreessen is about to get a wake-up call.

REALITY BYTES
Loudcloud wants to push its IPO out quickly. If the company can start the road show immediately after Thanksgiving, it could go out by mid-December, just days before the public markets go into sleepy mode for the holidays. It's a tight squeeze, but things are looking up. Chipmaker Transmeta Corp. (TMTA ) soars in its Nov. 7 IPO, jumping 115%, to $45.25. Loudcloud is heartened.

The optimism is fleeting. On Nov. 13, the Loudcloud gang troops into the posh, dimly lit conference room of Benchmark Capital, its top venture-capital backer that has put $20 million into the startup. About a half-dozen of the partners, including Loudcloud director Rachleff, David Beirne, and Kevin Harvey, drift in to hear the pitch. Andreessen, Horowitz, and Loudcloud CFO Roderick Sherwood speed through a dry-run presentation of their company. Sherwood is a 47-year-old veteran finance man with experience at the likes of Chrysler Corp. (DCX ) and Hughes Electronics Corp. (GMH.BA) The goal: to test the seaworthiness of the startup before embarking on the IPO road show. Less than 15 minutes in, one of Horowitz' PowerPoint slides sets off alarms. It shows that nearly half of the company's revenues come from running the Web sites of the beleaguered dot-com crowd. "Investors are going to throw up when they see that," pipes up one of the VCs.

Still, they don't discourage the IPO. Instead, they explore ways to downplay Loudcloud's vulnerability. "Why not call them `New Economy companies,' instead of `venture-backed startups?"' suggests one. "How about divvying up the software-company customers between the enterprise and dot-com categories. Will that dilute the dot-com numbers?" asks another. Andreessen and Horowitz are adamant. Potential investors will certainly ask about their dot-com exposure. "This is a good business model," says Horowitz. "We don't want to seem like we're hiding anything."

The dot-coms hang over them like--well, a dark cloud. Later in the week, the company's lead bankers, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, call to say they're lukewarm on an IPO before Christmas. With momentum quickly turning against an IPO, Andreessen and Horowitz decide to postpone their run for the money.

They break the news that Thursday to 200 employees at an all-hands meeting. Since they don't have a room big enough to contain the burgeoning staff, it's held in the parking lot behind their offices. Above the din of jumbo military helicopters taking off and landing at nearby Moffet Field, staffers toss out questions about the delay. One bold staffer asks point-blank whether Loudcloud might be acquired rather than go public. Horowitz is firm: "We're not for sale." The crew cheers. Little do they know, their best chance for a strong IPO has just slipped through their fingers.

FRIED TURKEY
With the IPO on ice until January, the pressure is off. The Horowitz household becomes a hangout for Loudcloud staffers. One Monday night, a group of 20 employees piles down in front of Horowitz' 70-inch TV screen to watch the Denver Broncos grind out a win against the Oakland Raiders. A couple weeks later, Horowitz invites some of Loudcloud's bigwigs over for Thanksgiving, where he puts his collection of seven barbecues and three smokers to use. This year, he's deep-frying a turkey. "That's his passion," says wife Felicia. In fact, Horowitz often grills competitively in contests across the country.

There's time for fun around the spacious third-floor office shared by Horowitz and Andreessen. Andreessen likes to prod Horowitz over his distaste for vanity, putting up his buddy's photo as his computer screen saver. Horowitz laughs about Andreessen's old Netscape habits, where the young whiz was known to plow through a bag of Chips Ahoy cookies and a quart of milk in an hour-long meeting. Today, Andreessen is a health nut, his lanky 6-foot, 4-inch frame slimmed by more than 50 pounds to around 225 pounds. His office mini-refrigerator is stocked with healthy snacks prepared by his personal chef.

Andreessen, a bachelor, taps Horowitz for dating advice. During lunch one Sunday, Andreessen is flipping through his e-mail pager and spies a message from a woman he went out with a couple nights earlier. "What do you know?" he says, pleasantly surprised. Against Horowitz' advice, Andreessen had called her the day after their first date to ask her out again. When she initially declined, saying she was tied up with work, Horowitz was quick to say: "I told you so." Now she was dropping Andreessen a note to say her schedule had cleared up." Andreessen taps out an I-told-you-so-back message to Horowitz.

For all the ribbing, the two make a good team. Horowitz, 34, who ran divisions at Lotus Development Corp. and Netscape before taking a job as VP of AOL's e-commerce technologies, has a reputation as a patient, highly effective people manager. That leaves the mercurial Andreessen free to make sales calls and envision future products. The arrangement makes them happy. "I could be a CEO, but nobody would like me," concedes Andreessen. "I manage like the Incredible Hulk."

NO GO, AGAIN
Partying is over. It's Jan. 8, time for another go/no-go decision. Before 9 a.m., CFO Sherwood and Horowitz are working the phones, powwowing with bankers and advisers for hours. Benchmark Capital and most of Loudcloud's executive staff are itching to pull the trigger. The bankers are dead-set against going out. Their reason: Loudcloud's comparables--the stock prices of other similar companies--are down another 40% to 50% since early December. The bankers tell Loudcloud that even at a price of $5 to $6 a share, it will be a challenge to sell all the stock. Again, Loudcloud decides to hold up.

That afternoon, at the company's executive-staff meeting, Horowitz and Sherwood break the news. "The bankers' economists are telling us there's a 45% chance of a global recession," explains the gravelly voiced Sherwood. Andreessen, who has arrived about 15 minutes late, licks his finger and holds it up in the air. "That's 45% and not 44%," he muses. Adds Horowitz: "Yeah, it's very scientific."

Nobody laughs. Unlike two months ago, this IPO delay will have greater implications. Despite the crumbling market, Loudcloud has quadrupled its staff in the past nine months, to 586 people. Now, to conserve money, Horowitz is considering postponing a move into some new office space. Loudcloud's Mathilda Avenue offices are bursting at the seams. Immediately there's protest. "It sends the wrong message" to the staff, says Jonathan Heiliger, Loudcloud's COO of product operations.

Andreessen disagrees. "I'm not sure that sends any message," he argues, rocking back in his chair. "The window for an IPO is completely shut right now." Horowitz eventually puts off the move for just one more month. "We're already sending a message by saying we're holding back the IPO. We're saying the sky isn't exactly blue," he says. "We need to give employees a positive message, too."

THEY'VE GOT COJONES
Cash has become a worry. Loudcloud puts out feelers for a third round of venture backing, but offers trickle in at about two-thirds of what the bankers believe they can fetch with an IPO. That would put their valuation roughly in the neighborhood of $375 million. It's a slap in the face, considering that the second round Loudcloud attracted last summer put the company's worth north of $700 million. With bankers still confident that Loudcloud could be valued between $550 million and $650 million on the open market, a third push for an IPO begins in early February. This time, it's kept quiet, in part to minimize impact on employee morale should they be forced to postpone again.

The biggest question: How do they price the deal? Most public competitors are down more than 50% since Loudcloud first set its pricing last Halloween. That would put its asking price between $5 and $6 per share. Worried about the psychological impact of having a low, single-digit stock price, the company works a reverse stock split, essentially turning every two shares of stock into a single share. On Feb. 16, Loudcloud files its final IPO paperwork. The reverse stock split has allowed it to price between $8 to $10 a share--a valuation 47% lower than it had hoped for just months earlier.

It ends up a ragged day for the Loudcloud team. They pile into the 35th-floor office of Internet analyst David Readerman, at Thomas Weisel Partners LLC, one of their secondary underwriters. The view of the San Francisco Bay is stunning, but they're focused on the stock market news on Readerman's jumbo-size computer screen. After posting back-to-back solid days, the Nasdaq is down a freaky 120 points. "We've got cojones. That should be our slogan," bellows Readerman. Horowitz smiles wanly. "We're the only company that can go out right now," he says.

TAKING A BLOODBATH
It's an unusually warm New York City afternoon on Monday, Feb. 20th, when a black limousine pulls up in front of Morgan Stanley's world headquarters in bustling Times Square. Andreessen, wearing an elegant black coat, is the first of five Loudcloud execs to step onto the curb. They're there to give a 4 p.m. pitch to the Morgan Stanley sales crew. They can't miss the giant electronic ticker, 40 feet above street level, reeling off one stock disaster after another. Nasdaq is down 106 points for the day. "This is like an old-fashioned foot race," says Andreessen. "We're going to sell hard, and we're going to raise money."

Then it's a sprint. Over the next 16 days, they will notch 70 meetings in 26 cities. The audience is tough. At every stop, money managers are shell-shocked--some sitting on portfolios that are down well over 50% in a year. They ask why the Loudcloud team is there and why now, recalls Marketing Vice-President Scott Dunlap. "We go into conference rooms, and there's dust on the table," says Dunlap. "It's like nobody has been in there in months."

Many fund managers turn out for meetings because of Andreessen's pedigree. But that's not enough to convince them to invest. Managers with PIMCO Equity Advisors' Innovation Fund, for example, listen to the road-show pitch but opt out. "All of their comparables are on shaky ground," says Dennis McKechnie, a PIMCO portfolio manager.

As the road show nears completion, obstacles keep piling up. During their scamper across Europe, Goldman Sachs's research arm releases a report that tells investors to be wary of the Net sector Loudcloud is in. Livid, Andreessen calls his underwriters at Goldman. "Did you have to release this right in the middle of our road show?" he asks. "Are you trying to kill our IPO?"

ANTICLIMAX
It's IPO day. Andreessen left New York on the redeye the night before for California. In the morning, an exhausted Andreessen doesn't make it to Loudcloud's offices in time to see the LDCL ticker make its debut. Horowitz does a few TV interviews. Loudcloud staffers don't pop any champagne. The only celebration is an impromptu gathering of about 40 employees eating Krispy Kreme doughnuts and watching their CEO on TV. There are a few laughs and cheers, then it's back to business. Loudcloud got its money. But that's all.

Today, Loudcloud looks a lot like any other post-meltdown Internet company. It has a low-single-digit stock price, some employee stock options are under water, and most of its investors are in the red. Andreessen and Horowitz understand now that there are no exceptions to the new rules of the Internet economy. The company is conserving cash. It has delayed a costly TV ad campaign, it's hiring more slowly, and has eased up international expansion. "It was a whole different set of rules when we started," concedes Horowitz. "Everything about our business has changed. Now we're optimized for profits, not growth." With luck, Horowitz and Andreessen will one day look back on Loudcloud's early miscalculations as a bullet dodged, not one taken to the heart.>>

By Ben Elgin
With Steve Hamm in New York



To: Voltaire who wrote (35984)4/19/2001 8:02:23 AM
From: azluke  Respond to of 65232
 
KOREA'S SAMSUNG ELEC TO INCREASE RAMBUS DRAM OUTPUT

Story Filed: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:52 PM EST

SEOUL, Apr 19, 2001 (AsiaPulse via COMTEX) -- Samsung Electronics Co (KSE:
05930) has announced plans to boost its output of Rambus DRAM in the expectation of
an expanded market after Intel cuts the price of its Pentium IV processor.

Pentium IV uses Rambus DRAM chips, and demand for the central processing unit is
expected to surge and overtake Pentium III after the price cuts.

Samsung produced 5 million Rambus DRAM chips in January but increased production
to 10 million last month. It will again raise output to 15 million next month and 20 million
in the fall, which will result in a total production of 150 million to 160 million units this
year.

The increase in Rambus DRAM yields will take 30 per cent of the company's total
memory chip sales.

The company will postpone investment in non-memory chips and LCDs to focus on
Rambus DRAM.

"With the increased supply and demand of Rambus DRAM, its price per unit
will drop to US$10 level in the latter half of this year from the current $15 to $16
and the market will grow further," a Samsung source said, "And the rapid
increase of the Rambus DRAM market is expected to affect demand for
SDRAM.

(Hey gang, I still lurk this board, thought this RMBS info was very positive for the Bus. Look at the chart, wedge has formed and could break out to the upside soon. This news might do it.
AzLuke)



To: Voltaire who wrote (35984)4/19/2001 9:44:58 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
V: Here's a new BusinessWeek article on part of the I-Bank's Scam...

The Great Internet Money Game
- Business Week

businessweek.com

How America's top financial firms reaped billions from the Net boom, while investors got burned.

It's a shame the Government lets this happen.

Best Regards,

Scott



To: Voltaire who wrote (35984)4/19/2001 5:55:04 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
Some nice news for our resident NEWP heads ;-)

MotleyFool.com - Fool News
Newport Soars
By Richard McCaffery
Fiber optics and semiconductor equipment company Newport (Nasdaq: NEWP - news) reported strong first- quarter results in a weak environment yesterday, and the company's shares got a Nasdaq-style bounce as related companies such as semiconductor equipment maker Applied Materials (AMAT) stormed higher on hopes the worst of the industry downturn is over.

Newport's shares jumped almost 20% yesterday and another 10% today after the company reported strong growth in sales and net income last night. First-quarter profits, excluding non-recurring charges from acquisitions, soared 204% to $15.3 million, up from $5 million a year ago. Sales jumped 104% to $106.7 million, up from $52.4 million a year ago.

Despite the strong results and rising stock price, investors who bought shares of Newport around its 52-week high of $192 last fall are still feeling pain. The company's shares closed today at $42.20. But investors can take solace in the fact that Newport isn't an overleveraged telecom start-up, a bloated legacy carrier, or a goofy idea dreamed up by CMGI (Nasdaq: CMGI - news).

No, Newport is a 30-year-old company that sells testing, measurement, and automation equipment to a wide array of fiber optic and semiconductor companies, as well as a stable of university laboratories. The stock caught fire in the last two years as the fiber optics market accelerated, particularly once Newport gained traction in the nascent automation market. Newport wants to become the Applied Materials of the optics industry, providing integrated assembly, automation, and assembly equipment to components manufacturers.

The Applied Materials parallel is what propelled the stock to astronomical heights, and investors should be very careful with their assumptions. Newport has a long way to go before the comparison is valid. Still, management has done a good job proving that the optics industry -- which is really still a cottage business in many ways -- can be scaled.

Newport's LaserWeld and AutoAlign products are the heart of its strategy and the products appear to be selling, even in a tough environment. Part of the reason for this, of course, is that Newport's products are aimed at cutting costs for customers by helping them improve yields and cost-per-unit. Fiber optics components companies feeling the crunch are scaling back expansion plans and focusing on costs.

This works well for Newport, but it doesn't mean the company is immune from cycles or downtrends. The book-to-bill ratio of its fiber optics division dropped to 0.8 in the first quarter from 1.6 in the third quarter of last year. (A book-to-bill of above 1 basically means the company is receiving more orders than it ships.) It has clearly fallen off, and the company is now in the position of shipping more orders than it receives. Such is life in a cyclical business.

Still, when I wrote about the company in our latest Industry Focus I wanted to see growing sales of the company's automation products, and this appears to be happening. On the conference call the company said it will roll out its next generation LaserWeld product in May and it expects sales to accelerate through the year, moving into the double-digit range.

So where does Newport stand?

Newport's business focus hasn't changed and the company continues to make progress in its automation business. Manufacturers must improve yields and efficiency to become productive.
The long-term trend in the components industry is up, but no one knows what will happen in the short term.
There are still many privately funded start up fiber optics companies buying equipment. There will be a shakeout among these players, and that could affect sales.
Newport and companies of its kind are highly risky and should be approached by investors with a long time horizon and a keen interest in following a fiber optics company.
Have a great day.

Richard McCaffery invented Post-Its. His stock holdings can be viewed online, as can the Fool's disclosure policy.

For more things Foolish, go to the The Motley Fool's complete site! We aim to inform, educate and help you make good money, Fool. Also, check out the FoolMart, the place to shop for Foolish investing tools. Become a Fool for Motley Fool stock features, updates, contests, and product discounts!

biz.yahoo.com
Ö¿Ö