SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Computer Learning -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mr.mark who wrote (18903)4/18/2001 7:45:03 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110601
 
mr mark, don't know about IRQ conflicts, but would think as long as the apps using the same IRQ don't run at the same time it should be OK. But that's just my thinking - which has been dangerous in the past.

Gottfried



To: mr.mark who wrote (18903)4/18/2001 8:15:29 PM
From: tanstfl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110601
 
Hi Mark,

PCI interrupts are completely sharable under the current version of ACPI. However, non-PCI IRQ's (such as the serial and parallel ports) are not. Since the System information program is not really a dynamic diagnostic tool I think Microsoft has it display any shared IRQ's as potential conflicts. It's still the same on my one week old DELL with Win2k and 9 devices on IRQ 9 showing as conflicts.

Best,
Steve



To: mr.mark who wrote (18903)4/20/2001 10:15:41 AM
From: PMS Witch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110601
 
I found this a useful discussion of IRQ issues. It seems both readable and factual, a difficult achievement.

win95-help.brimac.com

Cheers, PW.