Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (96067)	4/18/2001 7:47:30 PM
From: robnhood	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

I think I figured out LLCF today----- Is it, " Long Live Clown Free"????????

To: LLCF who wrote (96067)	4/18/2001 7:52:14 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

LLCF if the analyst is a CFA and the stock in issue is in a fund designated for retirement it is a very different ball game. Will not post on SI other similar cases but messing around with retirement funds is difficult to hide and pretend pretenses. All one need to do is to prove that he invested as a result of a specific rosy report or an advise based on that report which worked out to be misleading or done reckless and the funds incurred substantial losses as a result. Haim