Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (13835)	4/18/2001 10:30:39 PM
From: BigShoulders	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

RE:The people that called his office and got "comfortable with $86" will not be pleased with your ruling. I was stating my opinions. When someone makes me king I'll let you know about my rulings<g> As for "The people", who are they? Where are they? I doubt the "comfortable with $86" ever happened. Re: I think since so many including Brinker used the $82 price in the First CT rally... then $83 is fair in the 2nd. Why? I don't see any relationship. The 75 1/8 number for the benchmark for Brinker's call is easily documented. I haven't seen any documentation for using a higher number for a benchmark. Calculation of an individual's rate of return could be different (higher or lower) Re: I think people are so tired of it now that they don't even calculate that failed CT rally... Then why are we talking about it? <g> Best wishes BS

To: Kirk © who wrote (13835)	4/19/2001 12:23:25 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

kirk, what do the following have in common... bill clinton, "depends on what the definition of "is" is." bob brinker, "depends on what the definition of "immediately" is." oj, "i loved my wife. if anything, she hurt me." btw, trying to use the number used as a basis for a gain as the "buy" point when he could have just called it the buy point (and has a history of calling buy points so we know he is mentally capable of the concept) is just absurd. clintonesque.