Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Joe who wrote (139245)	4/19/2001 1:03:54 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is perfectly reasonable when it's the state VS a citizen. The state has a monopoly on the use of violence and near infinite resources so this standard is necessary to even the playing field (a little). Thank God we have this going for us. It's worth fighting for to maintain it. It is an unrealistic standard when a citizen is forming opinions about politicians. If it were, then the only appropriate opinion would be no opinion, on any subject. You've got to be skeptical about everything you hear, but it's not unreasonable to weigh the evidence and come to a conclusions. I personally find Juanita Broadrick's story credible. In my opinion the events of that day happened as she has reported them. But so what? I have no power over Mr. Clinton. And for political purposes it's moot unless or until he attempts to run for another national office. What do you think about her story?