To: mst2000 who wrote (3761 ) 4/19/2001 10:11:48 AM From: LPS5 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4443 ...probably just want to see if any of the Yahoos want to take up the gauntlet again and try to engage you in a heated argument, huh? Try is the operant word. :) You got time for that kind of sport? Well, I've got lots of free time until Monday, when I start a new position, but but many of the arguments I've been engaged with didn't have enough credibility to give me the intellectual challenge ("sport") I've faced on other threads. Besides...my free time is largely spent away from SI, enjoying the city that I rediscover everyday, playing golf, going to the gym, reading, etc. Any news about Liquidnet's volumes since their Day #1 results? I haven't heard a peep. But, I didn't really expect them to release volume info every day, personally: I figured a first day "we're here and here's how we did," and then maybe a one month or quarterly report when such time period comes to pass. I have always been of the view that there is more than enough institutional trading volume to support the regular market and a variety of ATS systems profitably I agree. There's a lot of institutional business out there. As I've said several times, human traders are entrenched in the buyside-sellside culture, but there are definitely places in which both buy- and sellside entities can benefit from electronic accoutrements. Good institutional ATS' should seek to meet requirements that, first and foremost address various needs and fears of portfolio managers; second, for business viability, that meet those needs and fears that can't easily - via cost, speed, or other functionality - be replicated by block/principal/agency desks. In MBA terms, the prospect offered by an alternative trading system - particularly where institutions are concerned - must be one which forces the "buy" hand in the classic "buy vs. build" decision: impossible to copy, imperative to utilize. If it doesn't meet needs (real needs, as expressed by the institutions, and not ATS-defined needs) and can be copied easily, either via pricing, functionality, or speed - it's in danger from day one."list players" Yeah, that makes sense. POSIT has a lot of those firms/funds as a result of offering their VWAP SmartServer and the QuantEX system, so, it makes sense that eVWAP might appeal to some of them as well.Anyway . . . . . take care! You too - LP.