Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (12017)	4/19/2001 4:25:14 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

The focus is concentrated on CO2 because that is by far the predominant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Also, it's somewhat contradictory to, on the one hand, say "the science is uncertain, let's do nothing", and at the same time pin a lot of hopes on one alternative, undeveloped theory that has nowhere near the same amount of research behind it. Of course, the tactic of picking up on minor differences among scientists to allegedly discredit a broadly accepted theory is quite common on the "intelligent design" front. I guess the right does actually have some form of consistency in its "science".