SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (139466)4/19/2001 6:42:42 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Can you explain the scenario in which Bush might be required to testify about that? Also, whether or not he did or didn't was a personal matter (under your definition) since it did not effect anyone else. Clinton's lying under oath occurred in the context of a civil suit brought against him for alleged sexual harassment of another human being (see effecting someone else's life).

I do not understand why you can't differentiate between the two.

~SB~



To: Scumbria who wrote (139466)4/19/2001 6:42:47 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Pure speculation based on nothing other than irrational hatred.

If Bush was put under oath and forced to testify about his cocaine usage, he would lie too.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News