SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (12846)4/20/2001 1:22:26 AM
From: pbull  Respond to of 13572
 
Best analysis of telco chips I've seen:

From Salomon Smith Barney (Jon Joseph and gang)

OPINION

We are upgrading Vitesse Semiconductor from Outperform to Buy to reflect the
recovery in earnings power the company will likely produce later this year and
beyond. We are increasing our risk rating from High Risk to Speculative to
reflect the uncertainty surrounding near-term earnings. Our price target has
been increased from $27 to $36.

In general, we believe Vitesse is making significant progress in diversifying
its product base to reduce its dependency upon the competitive PHY market. In
particular, the company has shown increasing strength in the emerging markets
for network processors and switch fabrics, segments that are very early in a
move to off-the-shelf standard products of the sort designed by Vitesse. While
we understand that June will be down another 10-25% sequentially, we believe
that these strengthening new product areas when combined with a future upturn
in demand for PHY products positions the company well in the second half of the
year. On a fundamental basis, we believe that Vitesse's earnings are likely to
trough in the June or September 2001 quarter.

Consider factors that are 'new' in 2001

Over the last four months, not a week has passed without a fresh round of bad
news from the communications supply chain: weak end-market demand, excess
customer inventories, weak carrier balance sheets, cats and dogs sleeping
together, total mayhem. We believe the glory days of 1999 and 2000 are
probably never to be repeated, and there is no question that there are
significant inventory and demand issues to be worked through. However, we
believe the communications business collapse has an overshoot element to it,
partly because of macroeconomic uncertainty and partly due to seasonal effects.
The macroeconomic uncertainty is widely recognized but hard to quantify.
Hopefully, the Fed action of the last several months will resolve that issue.
In our view, the seasonal effect is less well recognized by chip investors but
somewhat easier to quantify.

In the past several years of telecom spending growth, communications equipment
sales during the March quarter have often been flat or only slight down
compared to that of the December quarter of the just completed year (i.e.,
sequentially flat or slightly down). This is despite the fact that the March
quarter is typically the lightest quarter of the new year for telecom spending.
For example, U.S. Department of Commerce data for communications equipment
shipments shows Q1 of 2000 was down less than 1% from Q4 of 1999.

In a year when telecom spending contracts, however, the seasonal effects can
become dramatic. Assume that Q1 of a typical year accounts for 22% of the
annual budget and Q4 accounts for 28% (in fact, DOC data shows that Q1-Q4 of
2000 split spending 23%, 25%, 25% and 27%, respectively). In a year like 2001
when the annual outlay for communications equipment might fall by 15% compared
to the prior year, Q1 of 2001 could be down 20-35% sequentially from Q4 of
2000. However, spending should seasonally be sequentially flat to up every
subsequent quarter of the year. That would help to drain inventories and
establish a more stable order environment. Indeed, there are indications from
Altera and others that some signs of firming in North America are already
appearing. We believe those type of data points are likely to spread over the
next several months. Although June is likely to be a very tough quarter, a
bottom in earnings declines will likely be set in within the next six months.

There is a bad news/good news element to this seasonality. The bad news is,
wireline communications IC sales will likely gain a more seasonal reputation
than in the past two or three years. Fundamentally, this may heighten earnings
volatility and will increase the importance of accurately forecasting next
year's telecom spending before the end of each year. On a stock basis, it will
likely affect the P/E multiples investors are willing to pay. The good news
is, part of the current tough sales environment can be explained by
seasonality, and companies will adjust to running their operations in synch
with the seasons.

Investment opinion

We do NOT want to downplay the well-known effects of inventory overhang and an
uncertain business climate. We also remain concerned about future pricing
pressures in the communications industry. Our increase in the risk rating from
High Risk to Speculative reflects those hazards.

However, assuming the 22-25-25-28 rule holds true, it is plausible that telecom
spending by Q4 2001 will be 27% higher than in Q1-01. That move from here to
there should feel like heaven to investors, in our opinion. Over the next six
months, investors (and the industry) are likely to get a clearer picture of who
the survivors are on a product basis, what earnings power is possible, and what
are the real spending prospects for 2001 and 2002.

Specifically to Vitesse, sales in June are already expected to be down 55% from
December, which should factor in a fair amount of telecom spending weakness and
supply chain inventory corrections. With investor expectations already so
fundamentally dire for March and June, additional bad news in the short-term
may have limited stock effect. In addition, we believe our operating margin
model for 2002 may prove overly pessimistic (we are modeling 21.6% for next
fiscal year compared to 36% for last fiscal year).

Vitesse is also a high beta stock (literally 2.41), and we believe many
portfolio mangers may use it to try to play catch-up with the overall stock
market rally. This may dampen the valuation sensitivity in the short run.

We are increasing our price target from $27 to $36, assuming the stock can
justify a 40-50x P/E multiple against the company's potential earnings power as
we exit calendar 2002. We would not be surprised to see the stock trade well
above that level if the twinkling of stabilization begins to spread. However,
there is downside risk back into the low-20's if stabilization remains elusive.



To: Boplicity who wrote (12846)4/20/2001 7:41:17 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 13572
 
STREET WISE -- A Slam Dunk by Air Greenspan
___________________________________________________
Thursday April 19, 7:55 pm Eastern Time
BusinessWeek Online
By Margaret Popper in New York

<<Among his many accomplishments, you have to wonder if Alan Greenspan secretly plays basketball in his spare time. Because what have the past 3 1/2 months of Federal Reserve maneuvering been if not an elaborate series of head fakes on the way to a slam dunk? Ever since an unexpected cut between policymaking meetings on Jan. 3, the Fed has been toying with market expectations. After disappointing investors in February, it spent most of April sending oblique signals that it would wait until its May 15 policy meeting before cutting again.

Then -- wham! On Apr. 18, the Fed delivers a half-percentage-point chop midway between its March and May policy sessions. The stock market expressed its glee with an 8% rise in the Nasdaq and a 4% jump in the Dow Jones industrial average. If it was a little bit of Fed grandstanding, surely Greenspan can be excused. Today's surprise was delivered exactly how it had to be for the maximum psychological benefit without giving the impression the Fed is the market's stooge (see BW Online, 4/12/01, ``The Case for a Rate Cut Now'').

The Fed easing comes just as the market is stabilizing and companies are rapidly correcting inventory overhangs. The move was timed to ensure that investors held onto the market's recent gains so that the all-important consumer, who generates two-thirds of economic activity, hangs in there and keeps spending. At the same time the Fed wants to preempt corporations from reacting to disappointing earnings with layoffs that would kill consumer confidence. The timing means the Fed could well ensure that the economy averts recession. With luck, by this time next year, the Fed will be more worried about inflation than recession.

CONFIDENCE-INSPIRING. ``This rate cut may be well-timed for consumer sentiment,'' says Harry Dent, president of the H.S. Dent Foundation, a money-management and advisory firm. ``Consumers were getting tired of waiting for the market to turn around convincingly.'' The Fed-inspired rally of Apr. 18 helped to build confidence in the market and convince consumers to stay invested. ``The market was already in a rally that was sustainable, but not likely to improve much,'' says Dent. ``With the Fed's cut, the odds are much greater that the market has put in a bottom.''

The Fed's stated reasons for the cut make the economic situation sound dire. The central bank cited concerns about the potential effect of the stock market decline on consumer spending, the precipitous decline in capital spending and corporate earnings, and slower-than-expected economic growth abroad. All concerns that have been valid for several weeks now. ``The data from March looks a lot worse than January and February,'' points out Marci Rossell, chief economist for Oppenheimer Funds.

But on closer inspection, the economic data aren't dreadful, just weak. While consumer sales sagged in February and March, Instinet Research's Redbook Retail Sales Average rose 1.4% during the first week in April compared to the same week in March. Granted, it's only one week's data, but that's 3.1% higher than the first week of April, 2000. At the same time, housing starts showed a decline of 1.3% for March, the first sign of weakness in 2001, but hardly a cave-in considering the underlying strength of the housing market.

CUSP OF CONTRACTION. On the corporate side, figures from the National Association of Purchasing Managers aren't quite as promising. Prices are down, which, by the way, gives the Fed more room to maneuver without worrying about inflation. And manufacturing output is up slightly, although still in contracting territory, according to Mike Ryan, senior fixed-income strategist for UBS Warburg. But nonmanufacturing output is down slightly and on the cusp of contraction, although still in growth territory, adds Ryan.

Then there's the mixed message from the trade deficit. It shrank from $33 billion in January to $27 billion in February, suggesting ``the American consumer is no longer in a position to hold up the world,'' says Oppenheimer's Rossell. Without Americans buying goods from abroad, foreign markets will slow more, and that eventually hurts U.S. sales.

The Fed's move also comes at a time when investors have finally accepted a new reality about the tech sector. Witness its reaction on Apr. 17 and 18 to Cisco, Intel, and Hewlett-Packard's announcements of sharply lower earnings -- barely a murmur. In fact, despite announcing additional layoffs of 3,000 people, HP's assurances that the earnings outlook would clear after the second quarter was regarded as good news.

TECH TURMOIL. But Air Greenspan understands as well as anyone that the tech sector, which has driven such a big chunk of overall growth the past few years, is hardly free of what ails it. ``We think tech companies will show negative earnings comparisons [to 2000] through yearend,'' says Milton Ezrati, senior economist and strategist for fund manager Lord, Abbett & Co. in Jersey City, N.J. He sees the current climate in the tech sector as a buying opportunity. ``Not because earnings will be robust, but because the market has already priced in the disappointments,'' he adds.

A crucial support to capital spending in this sector and others is credit availability. Particularly with large credit problems looming in the California utility sector that could affect just about every sizeable financial institution in the country, the Fed is still concerned that banks will stop lending, according to Ezrati. By continuing to cut rates, the Fed will try to ensure that if the system has to respond to a shock like a California utility meltdown, ``No bank will say 'no','' says Ezrati.

Available capital will help the most troubled areas of tech. ``Easier money will help the cash-strapped CLECs [competitive local exchange carriers], which are teetering on the edge of bankruptcy. It's not that they don't have valid business plans, but because they focused so much on build-out that they never got a chance to generate revenues,'' says Noel DeDora, a managing director and senior portfolio manager of U.S. equities at Fremont Investment Advisors. Winstar, which filed for Chapter 11 on Apr. 18, is a case in point.

The Fed likely will deliver another cut at the May 15 meeting, and it wouldn't surprise many people if it were another half percentage point, bringing the Fed's total easing this go-round to 2 1/2 percentage points. ``Greenspan is not looking for a reason to cut, he'll cut until he has a reason not to,'' says Louis B. Crandall, chief economist at New York-based consultant R.H. Wrightson & Associates. And the markets learned once again on Apr. 18 not to underestimate the master of outsmarting the markets.>>



To: Boplicity who wrote (12846)4/21/2001 9:54:29 AM
From: Clappy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13572
 
Bebop,

Do you think we fill that open gap in the Naz?

100megspop2.com

Or go further?

-SkidleyDootDah