SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (12095)4/20/2001 11:54:51 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
Cosmology
In the Theravada view there is a plurality of universes surrounded by water and mountain chains. Every universe has three planes: (1) the sphere of desire (kama-dhatu), (2) the sphere of material form (rupa-dhatu), which is associated with meditational states in which sensuous desire is reduced to a minimum, and (3) the sphere of immateriality or formlessness (arupa-dhatu), which is associated with meditational states that are even more exalted and vacuous. On the plane of desire, creatures are divided into five or six species: hell beings; pretas, a species of wandering, famished ghosts; animals; human beings; gods; and a sixth group not universally acknowledged, the asuras (demigods). The matter of the world is made up of four elements: earth, water, fire, and air, held together in various combinations.

Time moves in cycles (kalpas), involving a period of involution (destruction by fire, water, air), a period of stability, a period of renewal, and a period of duration, at the end of which the destruction comes again and the cycle continues.

Human existence is a privileged state because only as a human being can a bodhisattva become a buddha. Moreover, human beings have the capability of choosing to do good works (which will result in a good birth) or bad works (which result in a bad birth); and, above all, they have the capacity to become perfected saints or even buddhas. All these capacities and activities are accounted for in terms of a series of dhammas (Sanskrit: dharmas), instant points in continual motion or changing states, subject to appearing, aging, and disappearing.

britannica.com



To: Neocon who wrote (12095)4/20/2001 12:00:32 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
Pure Land (Sukhavati/Ching-t'u/Joho, Shin, and Ji)
The main text of the Pure Land schools is the Sukhavativyuha-sutra (Pure Land Sutra) written in northern India probably before the beginning of the 2nd century AD. (There are two original versions of the Sukhavativyuha. The longer one includes an emphasis on good works; the shorter version emphasizes faith and devotion alone.) This sutra tells of a monk, Dharmakara, who heard the preaching of Lokesvararaja Buddha many aeons ago and asked to become a buddha. After millions of years of study, Dharmakara promised to fulfill a number of vows if he finally attained buddhahood. He vowed to establish a Pure or Happy Land (Sanskrit: Sukhavati; Chinese: Ching-t'u; Japanese: Jodo), also known as the Western Paradise. In this Pure Land no evil would exist, the people would be long-lived, they would receive whatever they desired, and from there they might attain nirvana. Dharmakara then revealed in a number of vows the means by which this Pure Land can be reached. Several of these vows emphasize meditation and good works on Earth as a prerequisite, but the 18th one (a famous vow in the later development of Pure Land schools) states that, if one merely calls the name of the Buddha at the moment of death, then that person will be reborn in the Pure Land.

Many years after these vows, Dharmakara attained buddhahood and now sits in his Pure Land fulfilling his promises of helping humans achieve salvation. Here he is known as the Buddha of Unlimited Light (Sanskrit: Amitabha; Chinese: O-mi-t'o-fo; Japanese: Amida) or the Buddha of Unlimited Lifespan (Amitayus). He is flanked by Avalokitesvara (Chinese: Kuan-yin; Japanese: Kannon) on his left and Mahasthamaprapta on his right, who assist Amitabha in bringing the faithful to his Pure Land.

britannica.com



To: Neocon who wrote (12095)4/20/2001 12:06:36 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
Yogacara/Vijñanavada (Fa-hsiang/Hosso)
The Yogacara (or Vijñanavada) school is traditionally ascribed to the brothers Asanga and Vasubandhu (5th century AD), to whom may be added Sthiramati (6th century). These writers were systematizers of doctrines already being taught and contained in such literature as the Lankavatara-sutra and the Mahayana-sraddhotpada-sastra (attributed to Asvaghosa but probably written in Central Asia or in China). Yogacara explored and propounded basic doctrines that were to be fundamental in the future development of Mahayana and that influenced the rise of Tantric Buddhism (see below Esoteric Buddhism).

Its central doctrine is that only consciousness (vijñanamatra; hence the name Vijñanavada) is real, that thought or mind is the ultimate reality. External things do not exist; nothing exists outside the mind. The common view that external things exist is due to an error or misconception that is removable through a meditative or yogic process that brings a complete withdrawal or “revulsion” from these fictitious externals and an inner concentration and tranquility.

A store consciousness (alaya-vijñana) is postulated as the receptacle, or storehouse, of the imprint of thoughts and deeds, the vasana (literally, “dwelling”) of various karmic seeds (bijas). The “seeds” develop into touch, mental activity, feeling, perception, and will, corresponding to the five skandhas. Then ideation (manas) develops, which sets off a self or mind against an outer world. Finally comes the awareness of the objects of thought via sense perceptions and ideas. The store consciousness must be purified of its subject-object duality and notions of false existence and restored to its pure state. This pure state is equivalent to the absolute “suchness” (tathata), to buddhahood, to the undifferentiated.

Corresponding to these three elements of false imagination (vikalpa), right knowledge, and suchness are the three modes in which things are: (1) the mere fictions of false imagination, (2) the relative existence of things, under certain conditions or aspects, and (3) the perfect mode of being, corresponding to right knowledge. The latter state of consciousness and being is that ultimately attained by the bodhisattva in buddhahood. Corresponding to this threefold version of the modes of being and awareness is the tri-kaya doctrine of the Buddha noted above (the apparitional body, the enjoyment body, and the dharma body), a doctrine that was put into its systematic, developed form by Yogacara thinkers.

The special characteristics of Yogacara are its emphasis on meditation and a broadly psychological analysis. This contrasts with the other great Mahayana system, Madhyamika, where the emphasis is on logical analysis and dialectic.

This consciousness-oriented school of thought was represented in China primarily by the Fa-hsiang (or Dharmalaksana; also Wei-shih) school, called Hosso in Japan. The basic teachings of Yogacara became known in China primarily through the work of Paramartha, a 6th-century Indian missionary-translator. His translation of the Mahayana-samparigraha-sastra provided the foundation for the She-lun school, which preceded the Fa-hsiang school as the vehicle of Yogacara thought in China. Fa-hsiang was founded by Hsüan-tsang, the 7th-century Chinese pilgrim-translator, and his main disciple, K'uei-chi. Hsüan-tsang went to India and studied the doctrines derived from Dharmapala (d. 507) and taught at the Vijñanavada centre at Valabhi. When he returned to China he translated Dharmapala's Vijñapti-matrata-siddhi and many other works. His teachings followed mainly the line of Dharmapala but also included the ideas of other Indian teachers such as Dignaga and Sthiramati. They were expressed systematically in his works Fa-yuan-i-lin-chang and Wei shih-shu chi, the basic texts of the Fa-hsiang school.

Fa-hsiang is the Chinese translation of the Sanskrit dharmalaksana (“characteristic of dharma”), referring to the school's basic emphasis on the peculiar characteristics (dharmalaksana) of the dharmas that make up the world which appears in human ideation. The connection of this so-called idealist school with the “realist” Abhidharma-Kusha school (see above Early Buddhist schools: Sarvastivada [P'i-t'an, Chü-she/Kusha]) is evident, though many new elements are introduced. According to Fa-hsiang teaching, there are five categories of dharmas: (1) 8 mental dharmas (cittadharma), comprising the 5 sense consciousnesses, cognition, the cognitive faculty, and the store consciousness, (2) 51 mental functions or capacities, dispositions, and activities (caitasikadharma), (3) 11 elements concerned with material forms or appearances (rupa-dharma), (4) 24 things, situations, and processes not associated with the mind—e.g., time, becoming (cittaviprayuktasamskara), and (5) 6 noncreated or nonconditioned elements (asamskrtadharma)—e.g., space or “suchness” (tathata).

britannica.com



To: Neocon who wrote (12095)4/20/2001 12:09:32 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
Avatamsaka (Hua-yen/Kegon)
In contrast with the Fa-hsiang (Hosso) concentration on the specific differentiating characteristics of things and its separation of facts and ultimate principles, the Avatamsaka school (called Hua-yen in China, Kegon in Japan) stressed the sameness of things, the presence of absolute reality in them, and the identity of facts and ultimate principles. It took its name from the Mahavaipulya-Buddhavatamsaka-sutra (“The Great and Vast Buddha Garland Sutra”), often called simply the Avatamsaka-sutra (“Wreath Sutra” or “Garland Sutra”).

According to legend, the Avatamsaka-sutra was first preached by the buddha Vairocana expressing the perfect truth revealed in his Enlightenment but then kept secret when it proved incomprehensible to his hearers and replaced with easier doctrines. The sutra tells of the pilgrimage of a young man in a quest to realize dharma-dhatu (“totality” or “universal principle”). Extant are three Chinese versions and one Sanskrit original (the Gandavyuha) that contains the last section only. There is no trace of an Indian sectarian development, and the school is known only in its Chinese and Japanese forms....

...The most significant doctrine associated with this school is the theory of causation by dharma-dhatu—i.e., that all of the elements arise simultaneously, that the whole of things creates itself, that ultimate principles and concrete manifestations are interfused, and that the manifestations are mutually identical. Thus, in Fa-tsang's example of the golden lion in the imperial palace, gold is the essential nature or principle (li) and lion is the particular manifestation or form (shih); moreover, as gold, each part or particle expresses the whole lion and is identical with every other part or particle. When this model is applied to the universe, it suggests that all phenomena are the expressions of the ultimate suchness or voidness, while at the same time they retain their phenomenal character; each phenomenon is both “all” and “one.” All the constituents of the world (the dharmas) are interdependent, cannot exist independently, and each of them possesses a sixfold nature: universality, speciality, similarity, diversity, integration, and differentiation.

The ideal is a harmonious totality of things encountered in the perfectly enlightened buddha. The buddha-nature is present potentially in all things. There are an infinite number of buddhas and buddha realms. There are myriads of buddhas in every grain of sand and a buddha realm at the tip of a hair.

The universe is fourfold: a world of factual, practical reality; a world of principle or theory; a world of principle and facts harmonized; and a world of factual realities interwoven and mutually identified. The first three aspects are the particular emphases of other Buddhist schools. The fourth aspect—emphasizing the harmonious whole—is the distinctive doctrine that represents the perfect knowledge that was attained by the buddha Vairocana and is communicated in the Avatamsaka-sutra.

britannica.com



To: Neocon who wrote (12095)4/20/2001 12:14:47 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
Nichiren
The indigenous Japanese Nichiren school is related both to the Lotus Sutra and Pure Land schools, for it, too, is centred on the “Lotus of the True Law” and also emphasizes fervent faith and the repetition of a key phrase. Hence it has been aptly called “Lotus-pietism” by a famous scholar in Japanese Buddhism. Its distinctiveness is rooted in the extraordinary personality and character of its founder; significantly, it is named after a man, a historical person, not after a book or a doctrine. Nichiren (1222–82), the son of a poor fisherman, became a monk at an early age and studied at Mount Hiei, the centre of the Tendai school. Nichiren was frustrated, however, by the many paths of Buddhism promising salvation and left Mount Hiei for 10 years to search for the true path. When he emerged from his independent studies he taught that the Lotus Sutra (Saddharmapundarika-sutra) contains the final and supreme teaching of the Buddha Sakyamuni and offers the only true way to salvation. According to Nichiren's interpretation of this sutra, the three forms of the Buddha—the universal or law body (dharma-kaya), the enjoyment body (sambhoga-kaya), and the phenomenal body (nirmana-kaya)—should be granted equal respect, as they are important aspects of the Buddha Sakyamuni. Following the teachings of Chih'i, the Chinese founder of T'ien-t'ai/Tendai, that the Lotus Sutra is the essence of Buddhism, Nichiren held that this same buddha-nature was possessed by all people and could be realized only by proper worship of the Lotus Sutra. Furthermore, Nichiren felt that his time, which was marked by political upheaval and unrest, was the period of degeneration known in the Lotus Sutra as the time of the latter-day dharma (mappo). During this time the purity of the Buddhist doctrines could be kept only by the bodhisattvas. Nichiren identified himself as an incarnation of several of these bodhisattvas, especially the bodhisattva of supreme conduct (Visistacaritra; Japanese: Jogyobosatsu), and believed that his mission was to propagate the true teachings of the Lotus Sutra in Japan, which he felt would become the new repository of the Buddhist dharma.

In attempting to guide Japan to the Buddhist dharma as he interpreted it, Nichiren drew great criticism for his strong-willed and uncompromising attitude. In one treatise Nichiren wrote that the unrest in Japan was caused by the chaotic state of religious beliefs, a condition that could be corrected only by adopting the teachings of the Lotus Sutra. He taught that if people turned to this sutra, they would realize their true buddha-nature, perceive that suffering is illusion, and see that this world is a paradise. If human beings—i.e., the Japanese—did not follow the teachings of the Lotus Sutra, however, natural disasters and invasions would result. With firm confidence in the righteousness of his cause, Nichiren attacked the Shingon and Amida sects of Buddhism for neglecting Sakyamuni, the true Buddha of the Lotus Sutra; and he attacked Zen for placing stress only upon Sakyamuni's historical form. These sharp criticisms led Nichiren to be exiled twice and almost brought his execution, from which he was—according to his account and the belief of his adherents—miraculously saved.

Nichiren advocated two main religious practices based on his interpretation of the Lotus Sutra. The first is the worship of the honzon (or gohonzon), a mandala (symbolic diagram) designed by Nichiren, representing the buddha-nature that is in all humans, as well as the three forms of the Buddha Sakyamuni. The second is the repetition of the phrase namu Myoho renge kyo (salutation to the Lotus Sutra), a practice called daimoku (“sacred title”), as the affirmation of the devotee's belief in the teaching and efficacy of the Lotus Sutra. This repetition was not only to be done orally but in every action of the true believer. Nichiren also taught that there should be a sacred place of ordination (kaidan) where the believer could receive training in the doctrines of the Lotus Sutra in order that he might keep the true spirit of this document. This sacred place might be seen as wherever the believer in the Lotus Sutra lives, for there is the Buddhist truth. The honzon, daimoku, and kaidan constitute “the three great secret laws” (or “mysteries”) that are regarded as the essential teaching of Nichiren.

britannica.com



To: Neocon who wrote (12095)4/20/2001 12:18:18 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
Tibetan Buddhism
also called (incorrectly) Lamaism, distinctive form of Buddhism that evolved from the 7th century AD in Tibet. It is based mainly on the rigorous intellectual disciplines of Madhyamika and Yogacara philosophy and utilizes the symbolic ritual practices of Vajrayana (Tantric Buddhism). Tibetan Buddhism also incorporates the monastic disciplines of early Theravada Buddhism and the shamanistic features of the indigenous Tibetan religion, Bon. Characteristic of Tibetan Buddhism is the unusually large segment of the population actively engaged in religious pursuits (up until the Chinese communist takeover of the country in the 1950s an estimated one-quarter of the inhabitants were members of religious orders); its system of “reincarnating lamas”; the traditional merger of the spiritual and temporal authority in the office and person of the Dalai Lama; and the vast number of divine beings (each with its own family, consort, and pacific and terrifying aspects), which are considered symbolic representations of the psychic life by the religiously sophisticated and accepted as realities by the common people.

britannica.com