Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (139781)	4/20/2001 5:29:12 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769667

<<Bush has no understanding or comprehension of environmental issues. >> So you say. Have you ever talked to him about it? He's an outdoorsman and they tend to have a better understanding of the environment than most. Have you seen the house he's building? It will be one of the most environmentally friendly homes in the US. He has started a study on the arsenic problem and may LOWER the standard more than Clinton did. But his program won't be a midnight, on the last day mandate. <<He has only been out of the country three times in his life, >> Truman had never been out of Missouri. Your hero Clinton left once to flunk out of Oxford and praise the USSR for sending bullets to the VC to kill Americans. <<he has no intention of paying down the national debt.>> How do you know what his intentions are? Are you psycho or whatever? The debt can only be reduced as fast as bonds come due unless you pay extra vig. If the surplus is as big as Clinton claimed there's room for a tax cut and debt reduction. <<Strike three, he's out............>> No, he's in for 7 1/2 more years.

To: Scumbria who wrote (139781)	4/20/2001 6:31:42 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

He was smart enough to toss the Kyoto Protocols out the window. A treaty you knew virtually nothing about and few weeks ago, yet were ready for us to sign up to it because of a few popular press articles you might have read. Not one of the Democrats on this board who rail against Bush's environmental record has posted any credible argument for the Kyoto Protocols. Nor has one explained why 95 Senators, (many Democrats) voted against the treaty. Mike p.s. I still don't blame you for completely ignoring the tax revenue discussion during Reagan's term, now that the facts completely dispute your claim. I guess only conservatives on this board can admit when they're occasionally wrong.