SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (139833)4/20/2001 7:33:42 PM
From: Greta Mc  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
But who started questioning the law?

It was Gore and he needed Florida's electoral votes to win, so he put the legal wheels in motion, and it delayed election results for a few weeks, which was not in the best interests of the country.

Is the Florida law ambiguous? Yes, it appears so.... but it only concerned Gore when he needed electoral votes...so, instead of clearing up the confusions before the election, Gore decided to dispute Florida's election laws after he needed their electoral votes to win and kept the entire country on hold after the election when the results didn't suit him.

I just don't see how the USSC had any other choice except to get involved based on the legal disputes over the election results, and the Florida courts interpretation of Florida election law(s). After all, this concerned the election of the President of the United States, and it was something that concerned the welfare and people of the United States.



To: Scumbria who wrote (139833)5/7/2001 2:51:20 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
It was not a question of interpreting an ambiguous Florida law. The ruling of the Florida Supreme Court was mainly on equity grounds, as was the assumption of the case by the SCOTUS. It was alleged, under the 14th Amendment, that the order of the Florida Supreme Court was defective, and deprived Bush of fair treatment, insofar as there were not clear standards articulated........