SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: smolejv@gmx.net who wrote (3138)4/21/2001 10:25:21 AM
From: marginmike  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74559
 
I posted to this effect a few weeks back. Being a child of late 80's early 90's education I was reared with the HEGEMONIC power theories". I think I read it in a book called 'balance of Power' by Kenendy. It's thesis is that there are always single or multi-poles of power. In the 1800's there were many hememonic forces. In the 1900's mainly 2(after 1945). In the 90's there was really only 1, the USA. In history this is a rare, and unsustainable situation. Rome did it for a whille, and Britain came damn close. However the fact is CHINA, Korea and the ASIAN blocks as well as the EC are re exerting themselves and will rise to be equall poles at some point threatening US power. It will happen in our life time. The question is how does the US deal with these forces economicly and militarily? Great Britain once controlled INDIA,Big parts of Africa,big parts of the middle East,parts of China, parts of North America as well. Now Great britain is just a few Islands. The Spanish were once the richest nation on the planet until the Spanish Armada was defeated by the british(forget the year 1698???). More importently the Spanish declined because the spent their wealth, sent their GOLD to forign countries for goods, thus depleting their wealth. This may be a good example of what fate the USA will one day sucomb to. History repeats itself, and eventially the USA will decline in influence and power, the question is how does the USA deal with this enevitability?