Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert F. Newton who wrote (5846)	4/21/2001 12:33:21 PM
From: Wildstar	Respond to of 45644

>>>Does that translate that he will be a great NFL QB? Not necessarily<<< Not necessarily. But he's got as a good a shot as anyone in the draft in the past couple of years to reach the "great NFL QB" level. >>>A better Donovan McNabb<<< Like I said, I saw both McNabb and Vick play a lot of games in college and IMHO, Vick has much more upside. Some called McNabb a bust after his first year and some will call Vick a bust after his first year too, but with experience, Vick has a chance to be a great one. It took Steve McNair 3 years before even scratching the surface, so it will take time for Vick also. The NFL has undergone changes in the last few years. Teams are actively looking for mobile QB's. Look at Culpepper, McNabb, McNair, Brunell, King, Gannon, etc. Vick is the epitome of the mobile QB with a good arm.