Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maverick61 who wrote (50944)	4/22/2001 2:58:07 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57584

Give it a rest. You should have bought LU as I suggested last week. You should be thanking me now not trying to criticize me as usual. I did look at LU's balance sheet. I didn't need to be a CPA to understand they were quite undervalued by the market at $7. And the same for LOR, NOVL, SCNT, VZ and WCOM. There are many things which are not on the balance sheets like infrastructure, real estate, name value, relationships and deals, reputation, patents, R+D, new products about to come to market (UIS has a big one coming) and so on. I asked you to stop attacking me and you can't resist even though I have tried to avoid you. That was a silly post just showing you criticize me for being right. And again I know it's just because your feelings were hurt because I criticized GW Bush last weekend. Well it turned out I was right about him too. Bush went to great trouble this past week to try and fix (cover up) the very eco-unfriendly image he was earning. I was right to criticize him and Republicans should have been as well. But no politics here. Take it to the GW thread. Why don't you try to have some fun instead of being crabby? Afterall, trading the market really is a game. Like chess meets poker. Post your own picks and get into it. Trade ideas instead of criticizing. Why worry about anything else?