SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Doug who wrote (75670)4/22/2001 1:22:16 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Doug what do I know ? The FED can set higher margin in financial markets exactly like they set FED Funds rates.

My only conclusion is that the FED is an inherently corrupt organization (by law) by means of the ownership by members who are regional banks who are also stock brokers and WS entities, if directly like C or BA for example or trough the assets they manage.

Many relate to the FED as an independent organization which it is not. The law governing the FED and it's ownership which results in substantial influence on financial market is flawed.

Haim



To: Doug who wrote (75670)4/22/2001 2:11:05 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 99985
 
Doug, the margin requirements and the lack of any change in these since the 70' is one point where Haim and I disagree on quite a lot. Haim believes the Feds should take action on that front, and my opinion is that they should leave that alone. My rationale is very simple, prior to the existence of massive derivative markets, changing margin rules had quite an influence on the market and the amount of leverage in the market, but now, the derivatives market provides for all the speculative leverage any one may want. Changing margin rules will have no impact, thus I believe the desertion by the fed's of that potential weapon in their armamentarium.

Zeev