Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dale_laroy who wrote (133120)	4/22/2001 5:20:31 PM
From: Windsock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Dale - Re:"With the exception of Tualatin, Mobile Palomino will be better able to keep up, and even exceed mobile P-III on both performance and power consumption..." There are no performance specs available on PalPony and even worse there is no product. Yet you conclude that it is superior. Vaporware really gets you Droids mouth breathers all excited. Back to the mod thread where you and your fellow Droids can live in an environment protected from reality.

To: dale_laroy who wrote (133120)	4/22/2001 6:49:27 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

BTW, I am an AMD investor. You write as though you're an AMD insider, or you make as many assumptions as Niceguy.

To: dale_laroy who wrote (133120)	4/22/2001 10:53:13 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 186894

BTW, I am an AMD investor. No sh*t Sherlock.

To: dale_laroy who wrote (133120)	4/22/2001 11:20:45 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

<Mobile Palomino will be better able to keep up... a 1333 MHz mobile Thoroughbred.. From the standpoint of grabbing a significant mobile market share...> Pardon my miscomprehension, but how it is possible to do anything "mobile" if you have no mobile chipset in closest proximity? Am I missing something, or what? In the mobile K6-era, AMD was able to ride on mobile chipsets designed for Pentiums, and gained some mobile presence just because of the Socket-7 compatibility. Now what?