SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (133154)4/23/2001 12:57:09 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Having said that, even if it doesn't amount to much in the big picture, it is still fun to brag one processor is better than the other. ;)

When people talk about Tualatin, they should expect much more than a .13u shrink of Coppermine. Tualatin will bring much more to the table. Remember when everyone expected Coppermine to be no better than just a shrink of Katmai? Don't think Intel stood still with Tualatin. They didn't.

EP



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (133154)4/23/2001 1:12:32 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Cirrus If it ever comes out, AMD will price mobile Palomino significantly below Tulatin and AMD may get a few design wins.

With the P4 1.7 GHz at $352 maybe setting an example, I'm not sure if there is an Intel "price umbrella" for AMD to get under anymore.

So, it's Tualatin, as in Tualatin River (below). Wonder why Intel didn't codename anything as Rogue, Burnt or Crooked?

dataweb.usbr.gov

Tony


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News