SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The IB Dude who wrote (39252)4/23/2001 6:23:03 PM
From: Jeff Jordan  Respond to of 50167
 
Uncle OJ?<g> " He's old enough"<ggg>He could even be my uncle...LOL

tenlights.com

cousin Jeff,

Hey Grandfather GZ.....you holding those long futures?



To: The IB Dude who wrote (39252)4/24/2001 5:57:16 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
Internet riches are out, master grocers and real estate kings are in, the old economy rules the new world richest list!!
Whay a difference a year can make!
Pile-it-high strategy pushes discount king to top of heap and has Gates deposed from the top of the rich
list. 'Old is gold' goes the adage old saying, Gates the most known rich man of the world has been replaced
by Wal-Mart chains, Robson Walton, a master grocer. Not many have ever heard of him before; he is a
man of old economy. He is a master grocer, sells milk, butter and consumer goods, last year it would be a biggest
joke to consider 'old economy' believer to de-thrown Gates, the living icon of IT revolution from the top of the
world richest man status. But this is the bitter fact.

This reflects a changed environment for technology and dawn of new Internet stigma on Wall Street.
Individuals and companies associated with Internet have lost their wealth heavily in the new list of
global riches.

This is going to come as a shock to children of the information age. Bill Gates is no longer the richest
man in the world. The new riches of Internet have lost big, 63 dot com millionaires last year have dwindled
to 26. Old money is looking good – in fact the older the better – with the Duke of Westminster named as the
U K's richest man. Imagine boring real estate owners and grocers once again regaining their lost paradise
as richest people of the world. Last year it was owners of software companies and Internet companies.
What a fall from grace.

It's that time of year again, when homage is paid to the world's wealthiest. This is time of the year when
leading newspapers of the world take out their Rich List. The owner of the Asda and Walmart chains, Robson
Walton, has taken Bill Gates three-year place at the top of the list. Supermarkets looked good in Europe,
too, with the Albrecht brothers, founders of Aldi, reaching the world's top 10 with 21.3 billion
euros.Self-made Formula One mogul Bernie Ecclestone has climbed to number three in the UK list. What the
Guardian calls the "technology elite" take a predictable tumble with the huge sell off in technology this year.

Media mogul and wannabe Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi of Italy, with a fortune that has grown by 5.4 billion euros over the last year, hold Europe’s third place. But second place – beaten only by the aforementioned grocers Albrecht – goes to French cosmetic maker Liliane Bettencourt. In change of fortunes it's not until number 12 that we see the word "software".

Globally, new industry – or at least older new industry is looking better. Bill Gates is still in the
number two spot, with other Microsofters Paul Allen and Steve Ballmer at numbers six and 15. And Larry
Ellison of Oracle, at number three, is a clear 14 billion euros ahead of King Fahd.

This new war between 'old economy' and 'new economy' riches continues, the chances of old economy
billionaires holding to their positions this time next year are very doubtful, the odds are that
productivity gains and global technology revolution that has corrected a lot has not ended. It is just the
beginning of next cycle. The low interest rate environment and low inflation is going to help the
debt laden communication industry the most, that industry was behind the huge technology spending last
year. IT spending and R&D spending are going to go higher with lower interest rates and increased global
liquidity.

Things don’t really look so bright presently for IT revolution believers, from 1999 when stocks spiked
merely by calling themselves dot-coms. Today things have changed on Wall Street for. Coms. In a sea change
of attitudes that explains the diminished wealth 63 dot com millionaires last year that have dwindled to
26 in this year world richest people. Today, no one wants to associate with the name .com or Internet.
This can be highlighted by last Friday action by Internet.com said it will retire its instantly
recognizable name in favor of INTMedia Group. Internet.com in good days could have had a hefty price
of 100 m $’s for just the name.

This is a poetic end to the Net-stocks. In a preliminary proxy statement filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, the company says that the new name will "more accurately reflect" that the company
"increasingly offers its services by means other than the Internet." Obviously, the corporate name change
has more to do with dot-com stigma among investors. Two weeks ago, talking-head gurus on CNBC dismissed
the stock by snickering about its name. After the name change was disclosed, Internet.com shares soared
17% on heavy volume, while the Dow Jones Internet Index tumbled 3.5%. Some observers guess that the
landslide in. coms continue by mutual funds anxious to excise glaring dot-com lexicon from their quarterly
shareholder reports.

This blind selling in my opinion will certainly create new opportunities, what is out of fashion today
will be in fashion tomorrow. Last year this time as Nasdaq hovered around 5000 mark, even to consider
investing in Internet sector was professionally negligent and open indication of herd mentality that
had governed a lot of ‘asset bubbles.’ Now to ignore this sector as prices have been cut to size, in all
likelihood may be ignoring value. Speculative excesses of last year have burnt many a fingers. Investors are
afraid to buy these highly speculative stocks however, only a levelheaded approach to investment and old
philosophy of buy cheap and sell high will work.

If this technology revolution continues than, don’t be to shocked to see a different list next year where
Gates gets his place back at the top of the global list of richest. If that happens market would rally by
at least 20-30% from here. MSFT recent earnings reveal that it has a lot of legs left to run on.
Celebrations to count him out from the next year’s top of the world richest list may be little premature.



To: The IB Dude who wrote (39252)4/24/2001 7:30:54 AM
From: Jerry Olson  Respond to of 50167
 
Zain thanks so much, regards to your brothers..