Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : InfoSpace.com -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Puck who wrote (2867)	4/23/2001 11:20:58 PM
From: silversoldier a/k/a SI Sy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3070

Puck, I'm sorry you submitted Post #2867. Freedom of speech and expression on the internet is too sacred to stop you from posting the irrational outpouring of libelous, scandalous invective which appears in your message. Any neutral observer would view your ranting non sequiturs and unsupported insulting remarks as indisputable proof that you fit the description of your characterization of Roger. You are anonymous on the thread. Roger is well known, personally, to many on the INSP and other threads. His excellent reputation is secure. There is nothing in his post, or mine, to suggest that he disputes your conversation with Nicole. Quite the contrary, as I specifically stated in my last post on the other thread. In fact, I doubt whether he yet knows about your conversation with Nicole. It was never mentioned by you, on either thread, until today, although it may have taken place near the time he posted the evidence of his conversation with Nicole. As a matter of fact, the earlier of your posts today did not contain any reference to the name of the IR woman who spoke to you. You owe Roger a sincere apology. Your reputation for integrity and decency is at stake. Sy

To: Puck who wrote (2867)	4/24/2001 2:24:30 AM
From: 10K a day	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3070

OK dude, now you stepped over the line. Please define > 'somewhat of a crackpot' <

To: Puck who wrote (2867)	4/24/2001 4:56:11 PM
From: tahoe_bound	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3070

None of the making up of stories is surprising. When dealing with desperate cheerleaders who have had the starch taken out of their pom poms, it is not surprising they would resort to tall tales to keep the group mentality cultists, or what is left of them, intact and spewing the same mantra. As long as they have one another though, and as long as the people are so nice and knowledgeable, the mass evaporation of one's wallet is secondary at best. Misery shared is easier than days of yesteryore when joining group mentality cliques was a bit more difficult. Just keep the faith, never waiver from the support group, and all is assured to be well and fully recover like a bad cold. History is meaningless in other words.