SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TTRE (TTR Incorporated) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (465)6/6/2001 12:58:19 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Respond to of 609
 
Napster Strikes Deal With Labels

By RON HARRIS
.c The Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The deal between Napster and MusicNet pits three major record labels against two in the race to
develop an Internet music system consumers will pay for.

Napster, the former music industry bad boy, said Tuesday it struck a distribution deal with three major record labels that are
launching a music subscription service this summer.

MusicNet is a venture between record label owners AOL Time Warner Inc., Bertelsmann and EMI Group, as well as
Seattle-based RealNetworks, whose software lets users to listen to music and watch video via streaming technology through the
Internet.

Their rival in the battle to turn the Internet from an undisciplined playground for Web mavericks into a corporate profit center is
Duet, a joint venture between Sony Corp. and French media conglomerate Vivendi Universal.

While MusicNet has cast its lot with Napster, Duet is working with MP3.com. The San Diego company, which was itself the
subject of a massive lawsuit brought by the record labels last year, recently was acquired by Vivendi Universal.

Tuesday, MP3.com president and founder Michael Robertson gave the MusicNet deal with Napster little chance.

``You have Napster, with no technology, licensing from MusicNet, another company with no technology and no products,''
Robertson said. ``It's a house of cards on top of another house of cards.''

MusicNet's online subscription music service will let music fans listen to songs piped over the Internet for a yet-to-be-determined
fee. Napster has also said it hopes to roll out a new version of its service this summer that would ensure royalty payments to
artists and labels.

Napster chief executive Hank Barry promised the new Napster service would not deal in trafficking unprotected music files, and
would instead rely on technology to protect and track the ownership of songs.

``We're not going to be moving raw MP3s around the new network,'' Barry said. MusicNet would require an additional fee from
Napster users, on top of a separate subscription fee.

But a technical solution that satisfies the music industry's copyright protection concerns has so far proved elusive.

Warner Music Group issued a statement Tuesday indicating that there could still be serious hitches in the deal.

``As previously announced, our content will not be available to Napster as part of the MusicNet service until we are reasonably
satisfied that Napster is operating in a legal, non-infringing manner...'' Warner said in a statement.

EMI also said that Napster's current technology was not quite ready for prime time, despite the pending deal.

Mp3.com's Robertson said solving the technology problem is only one hurdle. To be successful, a service also has to reach
deals with hundreds of individual music publishers, a process which is hindering MP3.com's goal of making music people
already own legally available over the Internet.

``This is a bunch of hand waving at the moment,'' Robertson said. ``There really is tremendous pressure on the industry as a
whole to roll out one consumer-enticing product. This industry has been notorious about announcing initiatives that never see the
light of day.''

On the Net:

napster.com

musicnet.com

mp3.com

AP-NY-06-06-01 0638EDT

Copyright 2001 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been
inserted by AOL.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (465)8/16/2001 3:56:54 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 609
 
Hey AH, your POS TTRE fell from $5.75 two days ago to $2.29 today (60%) and where are you? What an AH, you'll get yours. Shall we now sell MVSN relentlesly? You stink.