SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (45876)4/25/2001 2:41:20 AM
From: Ross  Respond to of 70976
 
OK, now I see that the holdup on the SVGI sale is Tinsley labs, that SVGI bought a few years ago for their expertise in complex optics. I would imagine that the committee that reviewed this has made recommendations, but they aren't public. I wonder if they would or could recommend that the sale go, but without Tinsley. I can see where the 5 dollars worth of doubt might come from. I don't think I'll put my life savings into SVGI arbitrage.



To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (45876)7/10/2001 6:57:06 PM
From: Bocor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Cary, back in April you posted this message with these targets.....are you still looking at the same ones and similar targets?

FWIW: Entered the following limit GTC orders to BUY:
AMAT @40,37.5,35,32.5,30,27.5,25;
NVLS @35,32.5,30,27.5,25;
KLAC @35,32.5,30,27.5,25,22.5,20;
LLTC and MXIM @37.5,32.5,30,27.5 (failed to sell the 35 buy);
ALTR @21,19.5,18,16.5,15;
XLNX @34,31.5,29,26.5,24;


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News