Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Perspective who wrote (817)	4/25/2001 10:14:08 AM
From: JRI	Respond to of 209892

Not to nitpick....but I thought we failed at 2095, and not 2100 yesterday morn...

To: Perspective who wrote (817)	4/25/2001 10:15:22 AM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Mild Warning For Non-Tech: We've dicussed this a few times, but it is something that we have to continue tracking or we could get a little blindsided... I did not like the height of our putative C in non-tech. It always struck me as rather impulsive looking. If we go with the idean that it has made a top, then we should be pointed impulsively down. Take a look at NYA and tell me if you think this can be so. It counts OK, but what I see so far as a 3 is the shortest wave, and that's a no-no. I do not see this problem in the more important S&P 500. Thoughts?