SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Duke of URLĀ© who wrote (133334)4/25/2001 11:52:43 AM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 186894
 
Intel Itanic bang on time to be late theinquirer.net

Mike Magee noticed that story too, Duke, but he read it a little more closely.

WHILE INTEL SEEMED TO BE telling The Inquirer at a breakfast meeting yesterday that
its Itanium chip was bang on target (cough) for a summer production release, there's a
different story over on Cnet.

Intel holds a breakfast meeting for UK journos once a month, and yesterday's was about
volume one unit (1U) servers.

Executives at the meeting told a tale about how production Itanium chips would arrive this
summer.

But, buried right in the middle of this this story about a new Intel push, it appears we won't
see Itanics until this autumn.

So no change there on previous years then. µ


I guess he meant this part:

Intel's first IA-64 chip, Itanium, is considered a crucial step in Intel's efforts to challenge Sun
Microsystems in the lucrative server market, but the chip has been a long time coming.
Originally due at the end of 1999, the chip has been delayed several times since, while Intel
worked to complete its design.

The company later grappled with clock-speed problems and now plans to release the chip only
at 733MHz, instead of 733MHz and 800MHz. Meanwhile, servers using production-level chips
aren't expected until sometime this fall. Adding to the drama, most server makers have greater
interest in McKinley, the follow-up to the first Itanium chip.
news.cnet.com