Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (2165)	4/25/2001 8:55:22 PM
From: frankw1900	Respond to of 24758

DMA: We are talkinig at cross purposes. Probably my mistake, See my previous post. LA's population density is one third that of New York. And I'm talking about the city, not Los Angeles County, (If you count the the suburbia around it, it's even less). On the other hand, it's an amazing low density for a big time city and that's interesting. Go to demographia.com and then to demographia.com and to demographia.com If you take out the unsettlled places or places with small densities then you can get any kind of figure you like: See: publicpurpose.com But the planners promise to change all if we give then enough money and enough authority to make the people do what's good for them whether they like it or not. I agree. My first post on the subject is a description of what happened and my guess at what's likely to happen. Most planners are micro managers and a huge pain in the butt. If we want to continue doing what we do then we need vehicles which pollute less. I'm not a nostalgic. Nineteenth century cities had horrible traffic and pollution -- horses are dangerous and pollute. The electric street car was a vast improvement and the automobile gave us great freedom. They also have consequences. Now, what did I say about planners? I mentioned insurers and mortgagers. Don't remember no planners. Frankw