Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (133437)	4/26/2001 6:27:05 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

John, Reading between the lines, I also felt that P4 performance at less that 2 GHz was OK, but wait till you get over 2 GHz. Otellini's comments on Rambus were interesting. Do you get tired of being repeatedly fed the same line of BS by Intel's management? Scumbria

To: Road Walker who wrote (133437)	4/26/2001 6:49:38 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

I thought it was a good thing also. They talked about P4 as if it was scaling VERY well. They also projected the yield on .13 as the fastest of any new process. Reading between the lines, I also felt that P4 performance at less that 2 GHz was OK, but wait till you get over 2 GHz. Otellini's comments on Rambus were interesting Once again proving the point that those self annointed gurus who condemned P4 based on the first silicon release running old outdated software/benchmarks clearly can't break out of their old thinking. Intel intended P4 to really shine perhaps a year or more after it's introduction. This is not your fathers processor. The future will be an entirely different computing experience and P4 will be leading the way. EP