Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Book Nook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (224)	4/26/2001 11:18:15 PM
From: JF Quinnelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 443

I have a long research paper on my old computer, something that was commissioned after the 1987 Crash. Some agency was worried that we could have another Depression and paid for a study. I used to hear the author interviewed on the radio a few years back, when we had a good financial station here in LA, and I downloaded his paper off the net. It is a very detailed study, with a lot of original research. One of his surprising discoveries was that margin terms, and the use of margin, was little different than present practice. That was not necessarily a cause for relief, since if margin was the culprit then, it could be again today. As I recall there was actually a smaller percentage of margin in play in 1929 than we commonly use now. And the famed 10% margin applied to a very tiny quantity of stocks. Friedman and Schwartz and Joseph Schumpeter credit the failure of the American banking system with having turned a common, although nasty, "Panic" into the Great Depression. Now, I realize that three economists from two different schools of thought pale in comparison to the Joe and His Dog School of economic history, but hey, I look for all the backup I can get.