Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (1173)	4/27/2001 11:12:17 AM
From: JRI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Still short....still operating under the scenario that this morning's 2 was juiced abnormally by the houses (futures) looking to unload inventory in the first hour.....we also got short-covering.....and some fence-sitters (and bears) who got faked out by the action, and started thinking long thoughts...that allowed for a retest of the morning high, and for some anxious moments for bears... (BTW- I think we got something similiar last Friday....houses kept things up abnormally during day....then, of course, the rug got totally pulled Monday morn, when the games stopped, and Elliott took full-charge. The houses like to mess with the pretty charts sometimes. If this rally or whatever has legs, I would think it needs to show a lot of strength in the next hour....for yesterday's candle has every reason to suck this thing down....I would think we are also burning some real bull fuel here, and 15 min./hour stochastics moving higher and higher, and should be turning down soon .....and we have several times tried consecutively to break (since yesterday) 2100 , 2095, 2090, 2085 and failed....each time failing at a lower point... Trying to keep an open mind here for all scenarios....just think this morning was just another example of the games played....way, way above my head... (Note: On this last little uptick, I noticed that the COMPX was unable to get back to equivelent levels to today's earlier Dow relationship...in other words, Dow went up further than Naz (relative to previous)....more negative divergence...and makes me feel that Naz is a little spent here...

To: AllansAlias who wrote (1173)	4/27/2001 11:18:18 AM
From: Lucretius	Respond to of 209892

what you think about these goldshares? that an ewave up? -bg-

To: AllansAlias who wrote (1173)	4/27/2001 11:45:58 AM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 209892

Boy, it's impossible to look at Old Eco and view the April rally as anything other than impulsive now. However, it looks almost done, so it should lead to a NICE shorting opportunity in the weeks ahead, off about NYA 645 (unless we get a failed "A" on May 2nd, hmmmmm....). Sorry I left the "e" off the end of the chart, but we're in "e" on that chart. That would imply a big multi-week "B" down (or "2") to retest the lows, followed by a "C". I prefer to think we're in a great big flat upward correction myself - just gut there based on funnymentals. Bigger timeframe is AFU. geocities.com BC