Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (140882)	4/27/2001 3:41:53 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

Dear dear dear J_F, why do you have a need to post privately. As you are clueless and post publicly a post that bombs you now post privately as a cowardly sneak. So here is you post. Friday, April 27, 2001 3:18 PM ET To: Thomas A Watson From: J_F_Shepard I think you're losing big time Snitch..... And wouldn't the webmaster have fun reading your last several notes to Scumbria.....?? Ya'll come back now, ya hear.......LOL!! ................................ J_ you all have a nice day now hear. tom watson tosiwmee

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (140882)	4/27/2001 9:45:02 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

No, we were driven out by people on our own streets. We couldn't win that war because we didn't want to bad enough. But we did not lose the war. We just quit. I expect the right weapons would have been similar to the one you mention. Just more of them in the hands of people who were willing and able to use them accurately and authorized to do so. A buddy in the Air Force said when Charlie attacked they had to go to the other end of the airstrip to get weapons because they were not authorized to keep them at their side. If you were guessing nuclear weapons, No way Jose'. That is not an effect weapon in Vietnam.