Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: blake_paterson who wrote (71298)	4/30/2001 11:18:46 AM
From: pompsander	Respond to of 93625

been gone for the past week. Trying to catch up. I agree with Blake that comments of counsel in the heat of trial, especially in conference with the judge, need to be taken with a grain of salt. Both sides will be papering the file for appeal purposes, so the hand-wringing, chest-pounding stuff is not unusual....however, judges don't like too much of that stuff. A little goes a long way and needs to be used at the right moments. I'm both sorry and glad I missed the trial activity up to now. Almost easier to read the synopsis after the fact and try to sense the proceedings.

To: blake_paterson who wrote (71298)	4/30/2001 11:22:22 AM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

I think there is a good chance at an infringement victory here unless the judge gets very proactive with his Markman misunderstanding. <G> Infringeon had the means, the motive and by golly the opportunity to rip Rambus off and these trial reports make that obvious.