Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (133694)	4/30/2001 11:55:50 AM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 186894

"If you need other lessons, I can recommend some basic finance texts." Oh, thank you, thank you. I have to apologize for making a honest mistake in the formula, I forgot to include the per Q qualifier, from the first part of Dan3's phrase. The formula now reads: (INTC Current Assets) - (Current Liabilities) was(=) (-$1,148M)/Q Do you feel better now, nit picking financist? For your information, any human language is fuzzy, and this board is not a peer review scientific journal. The meaning of Dan3 statement was qualified at length throughout his whole message, and only a low-intelligent person (investment-biased people included) cannot comprehend his statements, and immediately assume an attempt to misinform. BTW, in your lesson, you are using [<>] sign. I guess the mathematics of finances must be different from mathematics of science, right? Especially in the area of logic... So, I have a question for you: if the [change in working capital] is negative per Q, how many Q it will take to make the value of [working capital] to change its sign?