Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (133702)	4/30/2001 12:43:35 PM
From: herb will	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

pgerassi, "Excluding acquisition costs but not revenue is a big POS! Not depreciating Plant and Equipment," Well I guess Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors must be in cahoots with Intel management because I am looking at their unqualified opinion for the years 2000 and 1999 financial statements. Might I suggest that you email them of their error. Include your real name for laughs! Herb

To: pgerassi who wrote (133702)	4/30/2001 12:47:57 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 186894

Peter Principle - Re: "Intel has been lying to investors and those very same analysts for years. Excluding acquisition costs but not revenue is a big POS! Not depreciating Plant and Equipment, in even a bigger POS! Soon they will pay the piper." What a fool you and Dan are. Intel has been investigated by the FTC,DOJ SEC, and SPCA - and has come up clean - every friggin' time. Sanders openly lied to the analysts a week or so ago - and slashed prices yesterday. Sanders is the ultimate Pig in Sh!T - he's down there writhing in it - enjoying the slop - and you keep lapping it up. Paul

To: pgerassi who wrote (133702)	4/30/2001 7:52:43 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Pete, what happen? Did Paul run to SI den mother to delete a post? "To:Paul Engel This is a response to a deleted message From: pgerassi" Make it so, Mysef

To: pgerassi who wrote (133702)	4/30/2001 9:04:39 PM
From: Saturn V	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ref <Not depreciating Plant and Equipment> I had respect your technical information which you posted. You showed a very strong anti-Intel bias, but I did respect your opinions. However the above statement casts serious doubts about your judgement and sanity ! No company, leave alone a highly visible publicaly listed company can even think of doing what you state to be a fact. In future stick to what you know best ! Or else you will be dismissed as a raving lunatic !