SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (141486)4/30/2001 7:25:41 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
<<Is Russian radiation scarier than US radiation?>>

Not to me but I don't live over there. My take is that the US radiation stays in the containment building and in Russia it doesn't.

When Chernoble happened, a guy I went to school with looked at the wind patterns and crops and went long, leveraged, on potato production in the area. His longs couldn't be covered and he made a ton. He was killed by a shark the next year. Not a trader but a real shark while diving.



To: Scumbria who wrote (141486)4/30/2001 8:43:10 PM
From: SecularBull  Respond to of 769667
 
It's certainly more prevalent outside of containment structures.

~SB~



To: Scumbria who wrote (141486)4/30/2001 8:43:10 PM
From: SecularBull  Respond to of 769667
 
duplicate



To: Scumbria who wrote (141486)4/30/2001 8:43:11 PM
From: SecularBull  Respond to of 769667
 
duplicate



To: Scumbria who wrote (141486)4/30/2001 9:47:53 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The really deadly fallout came from Russian statism. Killed millions more than Chernoble did - which BTW was a socialist debacle, not a nuclear one.