Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Drillbits & Bottlerockets -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (9530)	5/1/2001 2:29:59 PM
From: John Pitera	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15481

Having countries do the dirty work in unregulated fashion is NOT the answer it's not a good one that's very true. higher prices will lead to more conservation, higher margins will lead to more output. both of those will help.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (9530)	5/1/2001 3:45:09 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15481

We need to fund the hell out of alternative energy and in the meantime pick a state that we intend to make the single toxic waste dump of the US. Well, I think I agree with you for once. Since a lot of the toxic stuff is in the Industrial Midwest, the only fair solution is to take the only Midwest state without an oil refinery, build about ten new refineries there, and dump all the toxic waste there. Quick, of the following states, which is the ONLY one without an oil refinery: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Kentucky. Can we agree to build the toxic waste dump in that one state, whichever one it is, just for fairness sake??? <g> P.S. -- Did you see the articles about Cheney's new energy policy? I'll post one over on the politics thread....