Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Group Therapy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Graphs who wrote (3456)	5/1/2001 11:21:53 PM
From: Duane L. Olson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4564

E!.. ...it's practically criminal, Duane! Since Wolf put us up to this (collecting big on Canadian royalty trusts), do you suppose we can be held liable for associating with a criminal activity ? <GG> While we are trying to resolve that... I've bought ERF twice more. Should be good for 20 years...... with time off for good behavior! <G. Sorry to hear about the non - esthetic wind farms. I'm not going to make a big effort to pursue those as one of our alternative energy source prospects for now. I was given a "tip" to check out " the best energy play going".... coal! and was told to check out CNX ACI and MEE (which I will do yet tonite). Meanwhile, I'm going back to gloating about those ERF and NCN "units" that have been so kind to us -- criminal activity or not <gg> tso

To: E. Graphs who wrote (3456)	5/1/2001 11:55:18 PM
From: Duane L. Olson	Respond to of 4564

E! The references to the NG situation are of some interest in this report on the coal companies.... Not that the coal story is uninteresting -- although one of the companies is barely a triple. Another is up a more respectable seven times</>(!)((700 percent) from the previious year's low... Where were we?? <gg> public.wsj.com tso

To: E. Graphs who wrote (3456)	5/2/2001 11:05:21 AM
From: Duane L. Olson	Respond to of 4564

E! "Favorable" report today (CNBC) on the energy situation may be less favorable to us... we got an immediate reaction across various energy stocks, including ours. FWIW, I'm playing this as one more of a series of similar reactions in an otherwise more positiive (for investors) energy play. But we might have to rely on those big dividends for a llittle while... That last NG price chart I posted gave us something of a clue, in retorspect, that it was not going to be straight up for NG.... but I did think it would hold around $5. Since the "normal" price a year ago was $2/Mcf, I guess we could accept quite a bit of weakness...... Wolf told us these can be volatile.... guess that includes more than just a steady "up, up, up" --- though I'd vote for that, given a choice <gg> tfc-charts.w2d.com tso