SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (142096)5/3/2001 12:44:07 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Isn't it about time for your daily lecture on push passing? Sissy sports are always filled with liberal blowhards.



To: Scumbria who wrote (142096)5/3/2001 12:57:32 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The analysis is faulty. To give only one example, unemployment when Reagan took over, and the recession was necessary to flush out inflation, and spiked unemployment further. The relative decrease in unemployment was much greater under Reagan than Clinton, who started with a big advantage. Also, Clinton was doing about as well as Bush had at the beginning of his administration, until after '95, when things took off. If anything, that suggests the result of the Republican Congress taking control of the agenda.



To: Scumbria who wrote (142096)5/3/2001 12:57:33 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
All the numbers that guy uses are flat out wrong. I looked him up and he's nothing but a super leftist political gay rights gadfly.

Nice source, Scum.



To: Scumbria who wrote (142096)5/3/2001 1:02:05 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 769667
 
Fable 7: The Robust Reagan Economic Expansion Was Only a Result of the Steep Economic Decline in the Early 1980s

Reagan's political adversaries maintain that the economy expanded rapidly from 1983 to 1989 only because of the underused resources from the severe recession of 1981-82. This interpretation of the 1980s expansion is contradicted by two facts. First, even taking into account the deep recession years of 1981-82, the economy grew at a faster rate over the entire Reagan period than it did over the Ford-Carter years and the Bush-Clinton years.

Second, the economic expansion of the 1980s was notable for not only its strength but also its length. Figure 10 demonstrates that the Reagan recovery lasted 92 months, making it the second longest uninterrupted economic expansion in the century--outlasted only by the 1961-69 boom.

cato.org



To: Scumbria who wrote (142096)5/3/2001 7:52:57 PM
From: cAPSLOCK  Respond to of 769667
 
Yes... didn't someone post something from the Cato institute with graphs and figures recently?

http://members.tripod.com/~zzpat/graphs.htm

This is similar but from the Tripod institute? ;)

Or was it the zzpat foundation?