SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Covered Calls for Dummies Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (426)5/4/2001 11:27:48 AM
From: BDR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5205
 
<<But neither of those states are predictable or sustainable, and 95% of the time the market will be up & down with only a mild directional bias. >>

Agreed. We can't arrive at investing principles based on just the past eight months experience just as we can't use 1999 as a basis for investing either. Volatility to provide worthwhile premiums and mild directional bias make it much easier for covered call writing. So do you try and time call writing or just keep at it writing new ones as the old expire? I am sure we all have a feeling that there are better times to write calls than others or better times to write far out of the money calls v. in the money calls. Some are better than others at recognizing trends. Some use technical analysis and charts. For example, Herm Matos, who started the "How to Write Covered Calls" thread (http://www.siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=12574), uses Bollinger Bands and some other technical tools. I have taken the liberty of cutting/pasting a brief summary of his technique below. His method would work best in a choppy market of the sort that you state exists 95% of the time. In the downdraft earlier this year there never seemed to be a good time to sell calls (hitting the upper BB).

Quick W.I.N.s. Review

1. Stock starting to move down [W]ithdrawing - The stock
appears to be pulling back after a upward cycle. Technical
indicators would be an upper BB tag, high RSI, positive
Stochastics, peaking OBV. Write CCs at this point to lock in
your profits and protect your downside. Use the BB and RSI
as you guide.

2. Stock starting to move up [I]ncreasing - The stock
appears to have bottomed out and starting to move
upwards. Technical indicators would be lower BB tag, low
RSI, negative Stochastics, low OBV just starting to turn up.
Cover CCs and wait. Perhaps you can buy more stock or
long calls as sideshows.

Stock moves sideways [N]eutral - Hold your position.

Defensive investor [S]ideshows - Buy cheap PUTs on upper
BB tags for reversals off tops especially around earnings
release dates. Buy cheap long calls after double-bottoms.
Average down and leverage your CC premies to lower your
net cost basis (NUT).



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (426)5/4/2001 12:30:27 PM
From: FaultLine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5205
 
My portfolio has "calmed down" since I started writing cc's a few weeks ago. The value of this portfolio, as Schwab computes it from the real-time market values, acts as if it has "shock absorbers" that smooth out the sharp ups and downs that I formerly was so used to seeing. This, of course, is exactly what one would predict when using cc strategy, but it is very interesting to me to actually see this effect in action.

For example, during this morning's NASDAQ 80 point dip, my QCOM, NTAP, and SEBL long positions were all off sharply. On the other hand, all my cc's on these positions were increasing at right about a ratio of 0.45 to 1 relative to the stock (a delta of -0.45). This reaction softened and stabilized the overall portfolio response to the more violent underlying stock actions. This is exactly what one would call a "negative feedback" loop -- the system I've constructed is compensating by trying to stay in the neighborhood of the setpoint (which loosely is my time-averaged portfolio value over my transaction cycle).

Naturally this cuts both ways but the next time I feel like grimacing when my upside gains are limited during a run-up, I'll try to remember the smile on my face this morning when I saw this damping effect in action.

--dfl