Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ThirdEye who wrote (142455)	5/4/2001 11:57:57 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

third,>>>>All I'm saying is that they all must have thought it was a good deal at the time third, the utilities were the bad guys and had no choice. Those who made the decision were politician trying to manage what should be managed by private enterprise. The politician once again had their communist heads up their communist butts. Third, what is efficiency. Is America twice as efficient today as it was in 1950. Yes it is. yet the retarded democrats still mantra about conservation. You cannot have the economy grow on not grow the ability to produce power. And there was no public bailout and PG&E was stuck with the stranded cost of 4.5 Billion. Third you seem to me to only believe based on the political bull you listen to. If you have never done cost benefit analysis looked into the costs of implementing different technologies, why do you not think anything you believe is just wishful thinking. I see what you are posting as poppycock. tom watson tosiwmee