Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (142698)	5/4/2001 5:43:23 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Excellent point, of course. And, of course, I think O'Connor was mistaken. But she is a dedicated jurist......

To: Bill who wrote (142698)	5/4/2001 5:54:05 PM
From: hamsandwich	Respond to of 769667

I was speaking a bit broadly, b/c O'Connor is the wildcard. She has been more recently moving "lock-step" with the conservative side. As far as your comments "Funny how Scalia couldn't convince "lock-step" O'Connor to join in on abortion", I'm not sure what you are talking about. Isn't Rehnquist the only Justice remaining from Roe? Perhaps you mean the extraction/dilation case of last year? In that case, yeah, she didn't vote with the cons. She has been an interesting and sometimes inconsistent voice in the female reproductive rights (or "abortions") cases. Enough. The tavern beckons. ham