SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (124653)5/6/2001 12:28:54 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Sarmad, a bankruptcy of Amzn would not destroy Legg Mason. It might cause some personal embarrassment for Miller, that's all.
>LM : LEGG MASON INC (NYSE) 12:19 PM ET

Last Trade 50.15 Open 49.10 EPS Growth Rate 31.62%
Change +0.67 Previous Close 49.48 EPS (TTM) 2.53
% Change +1.4% Today's High 50.15 P/E 19.81
Last Trade 4:02 PM Today's Low 48.88 Market Cap 3.13 Bil
Bid 0.00 52 Wk High 60.25 Shares Outstanding 62.32 Mil
Ask 0.00 52 Wk Low 36.50 Dividend 0.36
Volume 239,700 Avg Daily Vol 255,000 Yield 0.72



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (124653)5/6/2001 1:01:55 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
One has to think that manager is also doing some math. Since Barrons published that interview three weeks ago, amzn is up 100%. That's $300 million appreciation in that fund alone

Sarmad,

I am certain Legg Mason is incorrect here. I do not know what else to say about it.

I admit there is a lot I do not know but this is one area I really know. Maybe the only area<G>



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (124653)5/7/2001 1:57:10 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>>One has to think that manager is also doing some math.<<

sarmad, we just left a bubble era where, by definition, the successful folks didn't "do the math." if they did, they were ridiculed like fleckenstein. "bad news bears."

don't give these goons too much credit.