SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ScottOnStocks.com-2001 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Smiling Bob who wrote (220)5/22/2005 12:20:31 PM
From: Smiling Bob  Respond to of 231
 
Best Cars for the Bucks
Forbes.com
By Dan Lienert

NEW YORK - Automobile manufacturers--and consumers--have woken up to find that the emperor has no clothes.

Despite years of warnings that the car industry was becoming too reliant on sport utility vehicles and pickup sales; that Detroit in particular was ignoring its passenger car divisions at its peril while chasing easy profits; that Japanese carmakers were continuing to build more fuel-efficient attractive cars and light trucks, the recent implosion of demand for these SUVs and pickups still comes as a shock. But it should not. It has been coming for a long time and, like war, a change of season or a lunar eclipse, it now has an aura of inevitability about it.

"The SUV boom is long over," writes Merrill Lynch (NYSE:MER - News) in a recent report. "While a debate is raging among automakers about the health of the light truck market, and in particular, the SUV market, the data are clear that the SUV business peaked in 2000."

Go to Forbes.com to view a slideshow of the best cars for the bucks

SUVs may have peaked five years ago, but they have recently commenced what may be an unrecoverable nosedive. Just look at Ford Motor (NYSE:F - News) as an example. The company makes, year after year, the best-selling pickup (F-Series) and SUV (Explorer) in this country, but in the first four months of this year, its SUV sales went in the tank. In comparison to the first four months of 2004, Explorer sales declined by 23%, Expedition by 25% and Excursion by 29%.

The auto industry has no one to blame but itself. While Ford Motor's CEO William Clay Ford Jr. says he will forego compensation until the company gets it together and General Motors' (NYSE:GM - News) chief G. Richard Wagoner Jr. paints a target on his head by assuming complete control of the company's North American operations, these gestures seem too little, too late.

The reason is that Ford and GM continued to milk the SUV cow until it was exhausted. Did they honestly think the U.S., their major market, could sustain endless iterations of gas-guzzling SUVs? Don't they remember the gas shortages of the 1970s? Don't they know that fossil fuels are finite and subject to dramatic price fluctuations? Clearly, they didn't care as long as their factories were humming along and the dealerships were moving inventory.
Best Cars for the Bucks - Continued

Like the naked emperor, Detroit has been caught with its collective trousers down. For the most part, the emphasis on SUVs and light trucks siphoned away money and talent from the passenger car divisions, effectively ceding that market to the increasingly dominant Japanese. By how much? According to JD Power, in 2000 domestic passenger car share was 53% and the Asian (Japanese and Korean) share was 36%. Fast forward to the first four months of this year: Domestic share has slipped to 44%, while that of Asian makers has surged to 45%.

But not every automaker has been putting all its eggs in the SUV basket. A number of companies have been developing increasingly fuel-efficient cars, as well as hybrid technology. As gasoline hovers around $50 a barrel, many SUV and pickup owners now may be wishing they had sacrificed power and size for something a little more economical.

Go to Forbes.com to view a slideshow of the best cars for the bucks

So, in order to spend less at the pump--and in the showroom--which cars are the best for your bucks? While we normally don't focus on bargains, the slide show that follows showcases the vehicles that are the cheapest to buy and own, and those with the best gas mileage.

Of course there are still trade-offs. Gas/electric hybrids will save you gas money, but the lowered fuel costs do not offset the premium you pay for the technology. However, as the price of gas rises, good fuel economy becomes more valuable.

Also of concern is that you get what you pay for. Hybrids such as the Honda Civic Hybrid may cost more, but they are also pretty well made. Some of the cars with the lowest ownership costs, such as the Kia Rio, are that way because they are cheaply made and feel it.

If you truly want the cheapest car you can find, it has to be pre-owned. Unfortunately, this is too big a field for us to cover. Moreover, as we have done in the past, we wish to keep our readers informed of the latest cars on the market--and a piece about value-oriented new cars has more newsworthiness than one about used cars. However, we will point out that the average price of a new car is $26,100, while the average price of a used car is $13,000, according to Kelley Blue Book.

A couple of technical points:

The information about ownership costs comes from www.edmunds.com. The site calculates how much a vehicle will cost if you own it for five years. The estimated costs include depreciation, interest on financing, taxes, fees, insurance premiums, fuel, maintenance and repairs. The calculations assume that vehicles are driven an average of 15,000 miles per year.

We excluded from consideration cars that are in the process of being discontinued. This is why you will not find GM's cheap, but unlamented, Chevrolet Cavalier in the slide show.

You won't find any SUVs on our list either.

Click here for the slide show of the best cars for the bucks.

Video: Best Cars For The Bucks.
biz.yahoo.com



To: Smiling Bob who wrote (220)11/1/2005 3:19:50 PM
From: Smiling Bob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 231
 
U.S. Auto Sales Fall Sharply in October
Tuesday November 1, 2:59 pm ET
By Dee-Ann Durbin, AP Auto Writer
U.S. Auto Sales Drop Sharply in Oct. Due to Hurricanes, Rising Interest Rates, High Gas Prices

DETROIT (AP) -- U.S. auto sales fell sharply in October, dampened by hurricanes, rising interest rates and high gas prices. Demand was down after a summer of heavily hyped discounts, and automakers warned that they don't expect an upswing in November.

ADVERTISEMENT
Ford and Nissan reported big declines, while Toyota's U.S. sales edged up 5.2 percent.

Sport utility vehicles took the biggest hit across all makers. Sales of the Ford Explorer, Lincoln Navigator and Toyota Land Cruiser were all down 50 percent or more.

Ford Motor Co.'s U.S. sales fell 23 percent in October from a year ago. Sales of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury trucks and sport utility vehicles fell 30 percent compared to last October, while car sales slipped 3.7 percent. Ford's popular F-series truck saw sales fall 32 percent.

"October wasn't a very good month for anybody," Ford's U.S. sales analysis manager George Pipas said Tuesday. "It was pretty much weak from the start and showed little improvement as the weeks progressed."

Ford said its new Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan and Lincoln Zephyr midsize sedans were notable exceptions, exceeding Ford's expectations in their first month in dealerships. Pipas said Ford expected to sell 2,700 Fusion sedans in October but sold more than 4,000.

Ford's car sales rose 7 percent for the year, but overall sales fell nearly 3 percent.

But Toyota Motor Corp. said its overall U.S. sales rose 5.2 percent in October, boosted by a 12.6 percent jump in car sales. Toyota's truck and SUV sales were down 4 percent for the month.

Toyota's sales rose 10.7 percent for the first 10 months of the year. Jim Press, president and chief operating officer of Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., said he's optimistic about the rest of the year.

"The incentive-induced daze is lifting, and the hurricane season is coming to a close," Press said.

Nissan Motor Co. said U.S. sales were down 19 percent, including a 23 percent dip in car sales. Nissan's overall sales were up 12.5 percent for the year.

U.S. automakers ended their employee discounts the first week of October and were expecting some payback after phenomenal sales this summer. General Motors Corp. began its discount in June, and Ford and DaimlerChrysler AG followed in July.

Sales percentages were adjusted for differences in the number of selling days. There were 26 selling days in October 2005 and 27 in October 2004.

Ford Motor Co.: ford.com

Nissan Motor Co.: nissanusa.com

Toyota Motor Corp.: toyota.com



To: Smiling Bob who wrote (220)5/2/2006 1:39:39 PM
From: Smiling Bob  Respond to of 231
 
Ford Sales Fall 7 Percent in April
Tuesday May 2, 12:40 pm ET
By Dee-Ann Durbin, AP Auto Writer
Ford Sales Fall 7 Percent in April, Saddled by Slow Truck and SUV Sales

DETROIT (AP) -- Ford Motor Co. said Tuesday that its April sales fell 7 percent, dragged down by slow sales of trucks and sport utility vehicles as consumers turned to more fuel-efficient options.

Sales of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury cars rose nearly 11 percent over last April, and the company said its car-based crossover utilities saw an 8 percent rise in sales. Ford also reported the best monthly sales ever for its hybrid Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner, up 68 percent over last April, after it offered zero-percent financing on the vehicles.

But sales of trucks and SUVs were disappointing. Ford's best-selling F-Series pickups saw a 10 percent decline, while sales of the Ford Explorer SUV plummeted 42 percent.

The Associated Press reports unadjusted figures, calculating the percentage change in the total number of vehicles sold in one month compared with the same month a year earlier. Some automakers report percentages that are adjusted for the number of sales days in a month.

Ford shares rose 3 cents to $6.94 in midday trading on the New York Stock Exchange.



To: Smiling Bob who wrote (220)1/28/2008 9:06:41 AM
From: Smiling Bob  Respond to of 231
 
Prius Designer Says Industry Must Lose Oil Addiction (Update1)

By John Lippert and Alan Ohnsman
More Photos/Details

Jan. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Bill Reinert, who helped design Toyota Motor Corp.'s Prius hybrid, hovers in a helicopter 1,000 feet over Fort McMurray, Alberta. On this clear November morning, he's craning for a look at one of the world's largest petroleum reserves where there's not an oil well in sight.

Instead, in a 2-mile-wide pit below, trucks head to refineries with loads of sand weighing more than Boeing 747s. Yellow flames shoot skyward as 900-degree-Fahrenheit (482- degree-Celsius) heat liquefies any embedded petroleum. Floating scarecrows and propane-powered cannons do their best to chase migrating birds from lethal wastewater ponds.

Eventually, nuclear reactors may surround the crater 270 miles (435 kilometers) northeast of Edmonton, Alberta, delivering the power required to wring oil from sand.

``This is what the end of the age of oil means,'' says Reinert, 60, who plans the vehicles Toyota will make in a quarter century as national manager for advanced technology at the U.S. sales unit in Torrance, California. ``The car-based culture, the business-as-usual of building cars and trucks, is going to change dramatically.''

Since Henry Ford introduced the moving assembly line in 1913, the world's automakers have relied on a single source of power -- the gasoline-dependent internal combustion engine.

Under the Gun

Today, the twin threats of $100-a-barrel oil and global warming are convulsing an industry addicted to cheap, abundant petroleum. Auto companies, already hurt in 2007 by the lowest U.S. demand in a decade, are struggling to perfect cars that run on ethanol, diesel, natural gas, hydrogen and household electricity.

They're under the gun from California and more than a dozen other states to cut carbon exhaust by 2020 with vehicles that must get 44 miles per gallon (19 kilometers per liter) of gasoline, about double today's average. On Dec. 19, President George W. Bush signed a law that mandates fuel-efficiency of 35 mpg nationwide by that year.

Reinert says automakers are endangering themselves by basing sales and profits on the big, fast cars that many U.S. customers say they want in 2008.

In five years, as oil shortages and global warming intensify, car companies may be out of step with drivers' demands for fuel-efficient vehicles. Even worse, degrading stretches of the planet like Fort McMurray will only delay --not prevent -- the time when the world must function in a post-peak- petroleum economy.

`Sacrifice Zone'

Canada's oil sands region may eventually provide a quarter of U.S. crude oil demand, currently at 21.3 million barrels per day, Reinert says.

``At that point, the environmental impacts are totally irreversible,'' he says. ``You turn this area into an ecological sacrifice zone.''

Toyota investors, whose shares tumbled 36 percent to 5,100 yen in the 12 months ended today, say the company's priority must be weathering a weak U.S. market, not chasing breakthroughs in green technology. Last year, U.S. sales declined 2.5 percent to 16.1 million vehicles industrywide.

``There's cake, and there's frosting,'' says Jeffrey Scharf, president of Santa Cruz, California-based Scharf Investments, a fund firm that owns Toyota stock among its $700 million in assets. ``Hybrids are more into the area of frosting.''

Shareholder ambivalence about clean cars is only one hurdle to surviving the end of easy oil.

No Blueprint

Reinert, a former Navy submariner who stands 6 feet 1 inch (1.85 meters) tall, says he lies awake at 2:30 a.m. wondering whether he's making the right recommendations for the future of Toyota -- and the planet.

His suggestions run from building lightweight compacts and plug-in hybrids to redesigning smog- and people-choked cities and populating them with electric-only cars.

Reinert says nobody can say for sure how the separate tailpipe emission, fuel economy and manufacturing regulations promulgated worldwide by multiple levels of government will affect the environment. There's no blueprint for the impact of increasingly scarce oil on a U.S. economy already laboring with a mortgage crisis and a dropping dollar.

Add industrialization in China and India, and the number of cars and trucks worldwide may double to 2.1 billion by 2030, according to the Paris-based International Energy Agency.

Making Excuses

``We don't have a past, a history or a database that allows us to explore the simultaneous impact of recessions, disruptions to the energy supply and climate change,'' says Reinert, who spent six years in the 1980s maintaining solar- and wind-powered telephone towers in Colorado's Rocky Mountains.

``We don't have the legislative, regulatory, financial or product planning tools.''

Toyota is making excuses for not moving faster on fuel- efficiency, says Daniel Becker, a Washington lawyer and former head of global warming programs at environmental group Sierra Club. Since Toyota's 2003 hit with the second-generation Prius, which gets as much as 45 mpg in city driving, the company has slid backwards, he says.

In early 2004, Toyota and other carmakers refused to negotiate with state legislators before California developed its carbon restrictions. In December 2004, they sued to strip California of its ability to enact its own limits, prompting counterclaims that may end up in the U.S. Supreme Court.

``People like Bill Reinert understand the issues,'' Becker says. ``That hasn't stopped the company from turning to large trucks and SUVs to boost sales.''

Defending SUVs

Reinert defends Toyota's need for sport utility vehicles, minivans and pickups, which contributed 42 percent of its 2.6 million U.S. vehicle sales in 2007.

The company earns about $6,000 before taxes in the U.S. on an SUV. That compares with a $1,000 profit on a Corolla and a small loss on a Prius, says David Healy, an analyst at New York- based Burnham Securities Inc.

The Toyota City, Japan-based company made 450.9 billion yen ($4.2 billion) in the three months ended on Sept. 30 compared with 405.7 billion yen a year earlier. Sales rose 11.3 percent to 6.49 trillion yen.

``Without these profits, where does the investment capital come from for our research on plug-ins or fuel cells?'' Reinert asks.

Yet he fears Toyota and other carmakers may be too bureaucratic and profit driven to prepare for the energy- constrained future.

Craving Growth

Toyota's U.S. sales headquarters employed 400 people when Reinert was hired in 1990; today, 8,000 work there, and the U.S. is Toyota's most profitable market.

``There's a tension between pickups and hybrids within Toyota,'' says David Schearer, chief scientist for California Environmental Associates and a consultant on the Prius. ``They want to do the right thing, but the Prius is a relatively small piece in terms of overall sales volume.''

Prius sales totaled 181,221 in the U.S. last year compared with 30,000 in Toyota's original forecast when the car went on sale in 1997.

Toyota built 9.51 million cars and trucks last year versus an estimated 9.26 million for General Motors Corp. The companies appear to have tied in global sales for 2007, with GM saying today it sold 9.37 million vehicles worldwide, the same volume Toyota reported on Jan. 10.

Given Toyota's craving for growth and profits, Reinert says he feels like a 21st-century Cassandra, endowed with the gift of prophecy about the oil-related crises to come but fated not to be believed.

`Crisis on Top of Crisis'

The environmental desecration at Fort McMurray and the dangers in petroleum-rich countries such as Iraq and Saudi Arabia show why it's foolish to brush off warnings about an energy-depleted future, says Jan Kreider, an engineering professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder who had Reinert as a graduate student.

``We're going to have to have crisis on top of crisis before energy policies change,'' he says. ``Americans have this shock mentality where they do what they want to do for as long as they can and then set up massive programs to fix everything in a few years.''

So far, Americans are embracing small steps such as switching to fluorescent light bulbs. Meanwhile, at Fort McMurray's pit mines, it takes 2 tons of sand, 250 gallons (947 liters) of water and 1,400 cubic feet (39.6 cubic meters) of natural gas to produce one barrel of synthetic crude, says Peter Wells, director of research firm Neftex Petroleum Consultants Ltd. in Abingdon, England.

Schlepping Sand

That's enough water for a day's use for a U.S. family of four and enough natural gas for 5.6 days. The gas is burned to power a process that extracts a tarry substance called bitumen from the sand and then refines it into synthetic crude.

In turn, each barrel generates as much as 110 kilograms (240 pounds) of carbon dioxide equivalents, the same as refining three barrels of traditional light crude.

``When you're schlepping around two tons of sand for a barrel of crude, it shows that conventional oil is already well into depletion,'' says Jeffrey Rubin, chief economist at CIBC World Markets Inc. in Toronto.

``Price will ultimately ration demand. People won't be able to afford to drive.''

End of Era

Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers Vice President Greg Stringham generally agrees with Wells's numbers. He says each barrel of synthetic crude requires only 900 cubic feet of natural gas and puts out about 96 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents.

``It's definitely true that the era of cheap and easy oil is over,'' says Brad Bellows, spokesman for Suncor Energy Inc., which opened Fort McMurray's first commercial oil sands mine in 1967. ``Industry is looking offshore and to unconventional sources like oil sands.''

Oil sands facility operators are working to minimize environmental harm by recycling water faster and using the refining process to produce heat that's now generated with gas, Stringham and Bellows say. They're also trying to sequester carbon dioxide emissions underground and quickly restore land to its original condition.

`What People Will Pay'

Wells predicts world oil production will peak at about 100 million barrels a day in about a decade. By 2030, output will fall to today's level of 87 million barrels. Declining production will collide with rising demand, which could hit 118 million barrels a day by 2030 if trends were to continue, the U.S. Energy Information Administration forecasts.

``When production levels off, if the price is $200 or $300 a barrel, then that's what people will pay.'' Wells says.

Reinert says that although oil may drop in price because of a global recession, it's likely to gyrate between $75 and $125 a barrel for the next five years. Crude oil for February delivery traded at $88.36 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange on Jan. 22. It hit $100 for the first time on Jan. 2.

``Peter's scenarios for future energy are the ones I embrace,'' Reinert says.

Toyota's rivals are struggling with the same predictions. ``The biggest risk is the risk of a recession, of a shock to the global economy,'' says Larry Burns, vice president of research and development at General Motors.

Clarity Fuel Cell

``The second risk is China. China's growth is unbelievable, and it depends on energy. In every country that's providing China with commodities, you're seeing record years in car sales.''

GM plans to sell 16 models of gas-electric hybrids in North America by 2011. One of these, a Silverado pickup, gets 40 percent better fuel economy in city driving than the gasoline version, which gets 15 mpg.

At Nissan Motor Co., 25 percent of sales in five years may come from electric cars, hybrids and clean-burning diesels, up from 5 percent today, Chief Executive Officer Carlos Ghosn says.

``I don't consider climate change or oil prices as a threat,'' he says. ``I consider it an opportunity.''

In an industry first, Honda Motor Co. will start leasing its Clarity fuel-cell car in California this year. Fuel cells create electricity in a chemical process that combines hydrogen and oxygen, with water vapor as the only byproduct. The Clarity has a top speed of 100 miles an hour, a range of 270 miles and lease payments of $600 a month.

`Carbon Free'

Such advances may not come soon enough, says Reinert, who counts Toyota Executive Technical Adviser Norihiko Nakamura as an ally who shares his urgency. Nakamura, one of a handful of occupants on the top floor of Toyota's Higashi Fuji Technical Center near Mt. Fuji, says he worries the world's oceans could get so hot that they'll release carbon instead of storing it -- with catastrophic consequences for human life.

Nakamura takes his own measurements of atmospheric pollution and is scouring the world for alternative fuels. He's targeting hydrogen, electricity or ammonia as replacements for petroleum to ensure that auto, aircraft and ship builders remain viable for another century.

``Oil and natural gas are getting scarce, and there's global warming, so we need something that's carbon free,'' says Nakamura, 65, whose white hair almost reaches his shoulders. ``Toyota has a sense of crisis that there are only several years left to do something about this.''

`Mad Max'

The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, says carbon emissions must peak in 2015 to avoid irreversible climate shifts.

In its November 2007 report, the panel concluded that emissions of greenhouse gases at or above current rates will cause changes in the 21st century that are likely to be larger than those in the 20th century.

Among them are probable increases in heat waves, heavy precipitation and cyclones; reduction in the size of areas covered by snow; and a decrease in Arctic sea ice.

Reinert says that without action, oil may become so expensive that the world would resemble the one in ``Blade Runner.'' In the 1982 film, the rich live hundreds of stories high and the poor walk dark, rain-soaked streets.

Or the lack of oil may cause the breakdown of social order depicted in the 1979 movie ``Mad Max.''

Reinert says Fort McMurray provides a window into such fictional portrayals.

`Epic Proportions'

He predicts that the clamor for energy security will trump all environmental concerns worldwide. And he forecasts that most alternatives to conventional petroleum, such as oil sands and ethanol, will make climate change and water shortages worse.

Signs of indelible change already are emerging at Fort McMurray, whose soil was saturated with petroleum when landmasses collided to form the Rocky Mountains millions of years ago.

Oil-related development has displaced 330 square kilometers (127 square miles) of previously untouched forest rich with spruce trees and peat bogs. The population has doubled to 64,441 in 10 years, with another 20,000 people living in mining and construction camps.

Network of Refineries

Refineries, mines and so-called in situ extraction, in which underground oil sands are melted with high-pressure steam or set afire, have drawn investments totaling 155.6 billion Canadian dollars (US$151 billion) since 1997.

``It's an enterprise of epic proportions, akin to building the pyramids or China's Great Wall,'' Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said at a Canada-United Kingdom Chamber of Commerce meeting in London last year.

In total, 175 billion barrels of recoverable oil exist in an area the size of Florida, Stringham says. That compares with 259 billion barrels in Saudi Arabia.

``It won't be a lack of resources that causes a shift away from oil,'' Stringham says. ``There's lots of oil.''

Daily output of oil from Fort McMurray may reach 6 million barrels by 2050, up from 1.2 million last year, Wells says. Some of the natural gas to fuel production could come from the proposed $16 billion Mackenzie Valley Pipeline running 800 miles from Alberta north to the Beaufort Sea.

Connecting to Grid

Today, most of Fort McMurray's oil is transformed into gasoline, diesel and jet fuel in a network of refineries stretching to Edmonton, Denver, Chicago and Houston.

Reinert says it's not too late to mitigate the environmental toll of such development. Part of the answer lies in more Corolla-style compacts with light materials and four- cylinder engines. Part lies in hybrids such as the Prius and the Camry.

Governments and corporations will have to get better at setting priorities. Carbon emissions from buildings can be reduced for $50 a ton with measures like insulation. In comparison, it costs $2,000 a ton to cut carbon tailpipe emissions by redesigning cars, he says.

Cities must be redesigned too. People need to rely on mass transit and live closer to where they work. ``In a place like New York, there may not be a role for our traditional product -- I don't mean today but 20 or 30 years from now,'' he says.

Right now, Reinert's main job is designing the features that will attract customers to plug-in hybrids. In the prototype stage, plug-ins resemble the Prius with a small door on their side for hooking to an electrical outlet.

Milking Its Edge

``The transportation sector worldwide is 95 percent dependent on liquid hydrocarbons,'' says Gary Kendall, a World Wildlife Fund energy analyst in Brussels. ``The way to reduce this dependence is with a grid-connected vehicle.''

Electricity from nuclear power could be sent directly to the vehicles instead of digging up oil sands to produce liquid fuel, he says.

``I'm confident there will be an industry-leading plug-in from Toyota,'' Reinert says. The company plans to start leasing plug-ins to global fleet customers by 2010, he says.

Plug-ins can't arrive sooner because Toyota hasn't figured out how to mass-produce lithium-ion batteries that are affordable, durable and powerful enough for cars, Toyota President Katsuaki Watanabe said in Detroit on Jan. 14.

Kendall says the company can work faster. ``Toyota could bring plug-ins to market very quickly, but perhaps it's not in their business interest,'' he says. ``They're milking the technological edge they have now with the Prius.''

The delay in consumer sales until after 2010 means Toyota must endure taunts from GM Vice Chairman Robert Lutz. He told reporters at the Los Angeles auto show in November that his company will test-drive plug-ins in March 2008 and mass-produce them in November 2010.

``We'll find out who is right -- and whose credibility takes a serious dent,'' Lutz said.

World's Cleanest Car

Menahem Anderman, president of Advanced Automotive Batteries, a consulting firm in Oregon House, California, predicts Toyota will introduce plug-ins first. Toyota spent $7.7 billion on research and development in 2006, the most of any public company surveyed worldwide by Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., a New York-based management consulting firm.

To move beyond automakers' lead-acid and nickel-metal batteries, Toyota has as many as 300 in-house engineers studying the chemistry of lithium batteries, Anderman says. GM has no in- house researchers for lithium chemistry, relying instead on suppliers, according to Joseph LoGrasso, GM's engineering group manager for plug-ins.

GM spent $6.6 billion on research in 2006.

For all of the recent research, the Prius may still be the world's cleanest car. During its lifetime, it emits 110,000 pounds of carbon dioxide equivalents, including the amount put out during manufacturing, says Kreider, the Colorado professor.

That compares with 180,000 pounds for a Camry and 310,000 pounds for a Tundra pickup.

Less Friendly

``Toyota's leading position in the hybrid arena remains one of their key competitive advantages, especially given the recent high-oil-price environment,'' says Wendy Trevisani, who manages Santa Fe, New Mexico-based Thornburg Investment Management Inc.'s $17.4 billion International Value Fund. As of July, the fund held 8 million Toyota shares.

Some new Toyota vehicles are less friendly to the environment.

The 2009 Corolla with a 1.8-liter engine is 193 pounds heavier than its predecessor, with just a 1-mpg improvement in highway fuel economy. The Lexus RX400h hybrid SUV gets 24 mpg on the highway, 2 miles more than the gas-only version, and, at $42,689, costs 10 percent more.

`Increasing Our Profits'

``We're focused on increasing our profits, and the U.S. is key,'' Reinert says. ``This necessarily limits some of the options we might have pursued, especially as we move toward being a volume manufacturer, and especially in a down market.''

If Reinert is sure of anything, it's that Toyota can't go into reverse.

Since 1950, the world has been blessed with an eightfold increase in oil production.

Yet the peak discoveries for new oil came in 1962, petroleum consultant Wells says. Total production outside the former Soviet Union and the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries topped out two years ago, he says. Oil in the former Soviet Union will reach its highest level in about five years; OPEC will peak in about 10, he says.

In the interim, nations will be more dependent on the Middle East, where getting oil is complicated by war, political turmoil and declining output from mature wells.

`Governments Fail'

``After a series of incidents in the Persian Gulf, or a low-level nuclear exchange that shuts off oil supplies, you wouldn't have a short-term disruption like Katrina,'' Reinert says. ``You would have a profound one- or two- or three-year period in which economies and governments fail.''

Even when he's delivering dire assessments, Reinert speaks in the easygoing tones of a popular college professor. His interest in science came in fits and starts.

During the early 1950s, when he was growing up in Parcoal, West Virginia, he was poor enough to see running water and a telephone installed in his house. He moved to Kansas City, Missouri, after his mother, who'd been divorced, married a Ford Motor Co. assembly line worker.

Instead of following his buddies to Vietnam after high school, Reinert joined the Navy and ran engine rooms in nuclear submarines under the polar ice cap.

Reinert says his life fell apart after the Navy. His darkest day came while he was working at the Ford plant. He was put in shackles in front of his stepfather's friends for buying $6 worth of marijuana.

University of Colorado

After three weeks in jail, he enrolled in the University of Colorado and got a bachelor's degree in biopsychology. In 1979, when the fall of Iran's Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi sparked an oil crisis, he joined the university's master's program in energy engineering.

Reinert graduated and was hired by Kreider. His job was to attach solar panels and windmills to microwave telephone towers that were otherwise dependent on diesel fuel airlifted into the Rockies. He became a pioneer in so-called power electronics, coordinating electricity from wind and the sun with a battery and diesel engine. He maintained the towers via helicopters based in Grand Junction, Colorado.

Piceance Basin

The flights took him over the Piceance Basin, a 1,200- square-mile area atop natural gas deposits and as many as 1.1 trillion barrels of recoverable oil embedded in shale.

Reinert joined Toyota to run energy operations at the California sales headquarters in 1990. He spent eight years badgering top brass to let him use power electronics to design cars. He helped imbue the Prius with a hatchback and fold-down back seats for maximum cargo space and acceleration of 0-60 miles per hour in 10.4 seconds -- 4 seconds faster than its predecessor.

Reinert won the assignment of chauffeuring actress Charlize Theron in 2004 on the night she won an Oscar for ``Monster.'' He remembers how she hugged her mother when paparazzi pounded on their fuel cell-powered SUV.

The Prius earned Reinert the right to speak on environmental trends inside Toyota and to outside groups. ``Having a voice that may not be the company line is ultimately good for Toyota,'' says Jim Lentz, president of Toyota's U.S. sales unit.

Galapagos Islands

Reinert believes in changing individual behavior. After the oil tanker Rebecca sank off the Galapagos Islands in 2001, he, Toyota and the World Wildlife Fund joined Ecuador in a multiyear cleanup. They designed an oil delivery dock to replace the leaking structure built during World War II. They set up recycling centers for motor oil that would otherwise be dumped into the ocean and household trash that would be burned.

``We could actually make a measurable difference in a geographically defined area,'' Reinert says.

There's evidence in his personal life that such efforts may not be enough. Reinert and his wife, Pam, can't walk their dogs around their home in Rancho Santa Margarita, California, because forest fires exacerbated by drought and global warming are driving coyotes down from the nearby Saddleback Mountains.

When Reinert lies awake, he worries about the Piceance Basin, where he put his life back together after doing jail time and learned to be a hands-on scientist.

`Something's Been Amputated'

Petroleum hovering around $100 a barrel is rekindling the 1970s oil shale boom. Roads and tunnels are snaking into the mesas around Grand Junction; natural gas derricks dot the horizon. Shell Oil Co. is testing ways to heat underground shale to 400 degrees Celsius and capture the melted oil inside rock frozen solid by pumped-in refrigerants.

Daily output of synthetic crude from Colorado, Utah and Wyoming may reach 1 million barrels a day by 2040, Wells says.

Flying over the Piceance in a Cessna 182 in November, Reinert searches for the bald eagles, wild horses and elk he knew in his youth. He can't find any.

He studies the creeks that used to feed the Colorado River from melting snowpacks and finds them dry.

The river, which would nourish oil shale extraction and the growing populations in Las Vegas, Los Angeles and Phoenix, is narrower than the I-70 freeway alongside it.

Strip mines cut straight down into solid rock even after 30 years of reclamation. Another oil shale boom would further deface the Piceance.

``I feel an abject sense of hopelessness that I can't do anything to stop this,'' he says. ``I feel like I've lost part of myself, like something's been amputated.''

Desecrated Forests

Toyota's technical triumph with the petroleum-saving Prius shows carmakers can be a force in mitigating the environmental damage Reinert worries about. He says that's only a start.

As threats from the end of easy oil multiply and global warming accelerates, the desecrated forests and scarred earth at Fort McMurray may be harbingers of what's to come if automakers and politicians fail to act.

To contact the reporters on this story: John Lippert at jlippert@bloomberg.net . Alan Ohnsman at aohnsman@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: January 23, 2008 11:29 EST



To: Smiling Bob who wrote (220)7/1/2008 3:41:48 PM
From: Smiling Bob  Respond to of 231
 
=DJ 3rd UPDATE: US Auto Woes Deepen Amid Tumbling SUV Sales

(Adds Chrysler results, starting 15th paragraph; updates stock prices)
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES


The U.S. auto industry's slide grew worse in June as it reached the midpoint of a dismal year with collapsing demand for trucks and SUVs.

But late-month incentives helped keep General Motors Corp.'s (GM) decline in June sales to an 18% drop, better than the 21% drop at Toyota Motor Corp. (TM), the 28% slide at Ford Motor Co. (F) and 36% plunge at Chrysler LLC.

GM's results, well above most expectations, pushed its stock up 4%. The news also helped Ford rebound from a fresh 17-year low and push its shares briefly into positive territory, although its stock was recently down 3%.

Honda Motor Co. (HMC), like in May, was the lone bright spot last month with sales up 1.1% to 142,539, a record June for the auto maker. Car sales jumped 19% to 97,639 while truck sales fell 24%, much less than Toyota and Ford. And as they did in May, sales of the Civic and Accord cars outsold Ford's F-series pickups, as did Toyota's Camry and Corolla.

"Staying true to our core values is allowing Honda to weather the storm of rising gas prices and help consumers find shelter in our products," said Dick Colliver, executive vice president of American Honda. "Our factories are doing everything they can to produce the fuel-efficient models consumers are desperately in need of."

The declines by the other auto makers were exacerbated by three fewer selling days in June - 24 versus 27 a year ago. But $4-a-gallon gasoline also had buyers favoring more fuel-efficient cars and shunning the trucks and SUVs which have traditionally driven Detroit's profits.

In June, GM sales of cars and light trucks totaled 262,329, as light trucks fell 16% and car sales dropped 21%.

Last week, GM announced further production cuts as well as sweeping new incentives on many 2008 models - a reversal of recent strategy and a fresh sign of how badly rising gasoline prices are slamming auto makers. The company disclosed Tuesday that its third-quarter production target has been cut 15% to 900,000 vehicles, with truck production expected to be slashed by about 209,000.

For the second quarter, GM produced 835,000 vehicles, down 27% from a year ago.

GM, Ford and Chrysler have been trying for more than two years to back away from heavy sales incentives, which eat into profit margins and tarnish brands in the eyes of some consumers. But a worsening of the slump in car and light-truck sales this month is forcing the Detroit companies to go all out to halt sales declines. In hopes of spurring vehicle sales, GM offered no-interest loans for up to 72 months or cash rebates of up to $7,000.

Toyota sold 193,234 vehicles in June, with car sales down 9.4%, light-truck sales slumping 42% and SUV sales sliding 39%, though the latter was better than Ford's 55% plunge. Sales at the namesake brand fell 20%, but tumbled 30% at the luxury Lexus nameplate.

The Sequoia, however, rose 25%, as the large SUV continued its surprising winning streak. Through May, it was the only vehicle in the "large utility" segment for which sales have grown this year, according to J.D. Power.

American consumers' shunning of trucks and sport-utility vehicles in favor of smaller, more fuel-efficient cars has created an opening for Toyota, whose American product line is skewed toward compact cars, to grab market share from GM.

Ford's U.S. light-vehicle sales totaled 173,462 last month, with passenger-car sales down 12% and trucks and SUVs skidding 36% amid a 41% tumble for the F-series truck. Weak truck and SUV sales recently led Ford to push back the launch of its redesigned F-150, which was once was expected to drive the company's recovery, and led Ford two weeks ago to announce production cuts for the second time in two months and give up on ending its losses by next year.

Chrysler's sales slumped to 117,457 from 183,347, with car sales tumbling 49% to 29,858 and truck sales decreasing 30% to 87,599. President Jim Press said that, despite U.S. consumer confidence being at a 16-year low, "Chrysler is fighting back and making progress by continuing to invest in our products and aligning our volume with the market."

One of the company's main incentives - allowing customers to lock in $2.99-a-gallon gasoline for three years - is being extended through July 31 and is helping boost showroom traffic and sales of Chrysler's most fuel-efficient vehicles. But it doesn't appear to be helping the company overall, as it is much more dependent on gas-guzzlers than its rivals.

The gas crunch set off a dramatic shift among U.S. car buyers. Trucks that used to be strong sellers suddenly piled up in dealer inventories and consumers started flocking to small cars. Those had traditionally appealed to a smaller segment of the market dominated by Toyota and Honda, which had already battered the U.S. makers with their lower cost structures, higher margins and rising sales.

-By Mike Barris and Kevin Kingsbury, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5658; mike.barris@dowjones.com


Click here to go to Dow Jones NewsPlus, a web front page of today's most important business and market news, analysis and commentary: djnewsplus.com. You can use this link on the day this article is published and the following day.



(END) Dow Jones Newswires

July 01, 2008 15:27 ET (19:27 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.- - 03 27 PM EDT 07-01-08