<Oh God clown boy...we went over this!!!
I never posted it publicly, but it was communicated to several privately and some of them came forward publicly and proved it, squashing egg on your dad's face for calling me liar. There is my credibility.>
You didn’t!! You failed to reply my 11th April letter that is the basis of your demand of an apology from my father. You claim that you were 88% long whereas in reality you were writing about huge shorts and making fun of the market long and were actually pleading long gold.I have proven to you that you are a liar and this is to further cement my assertions.
That is the whole point, you are author of 'after the fact trades' where they don't exist and try to be big about nothingness. Are you on some kind of self enhancing promotion mission, am I reading this right < I never posted it publicly, but it was communicated to several privately and some of them came forward publicly and proved it,> what you were posting than is worst of lies Fred E. All your posts around that time are total crap, in coherent and non-sense. Read them well and I will keep repeating this post for every post of yours until I get the answers. If this is not unashamed lies what else is lying about? I am not at all convinced with this argument that all this was in confines of private, that is the whole point that you have just proven that you were lying about your trades and you do things in closet, that is what my father terms you as a closet trader!
You were 88% long gold not market Fred. Most respectfully can you answer the following please. On April 5 << Apr 5, 2001 11:54 AM Respond to of 67517 Fred's Gold call: ...no I don't think the naz has bottomed yet, but the XAU did late last year. Patience will be rewarded.>>
Where is your 88% long capital, if that cannot be proved you look like a proven liar to me? Unfortunately! The more you will prod the more of your non-sense will hit the fan, but I assure you I will stop your trading non-sense and slef promoting huge calls, you know it well this can work with some, not here. Paper tigers is the right term for you Fred, after the fact kind of guys.
This following post remains unanswered since 11th of April. Being economical with truth is a diplomatic way of phrasing for what is commonly known as ‘pathological lying’ that some unfortunate posters become habitual with. You claim to be long 88% of the capital, but your calls at the time are << CHUCK IT ALL MAN...SELL IT ALL...!!!>> next you talk about few longs not 88% of your capital << FredE Thursday, Apr 5, 2001 2:44 PM.. I'm thinking about doing a recycle on MUSE, BRCM, and RIMM at the close and selling the few longs I picked up yesterday.>>
My post of Wednesday, Apr 11, 2001 5:43 AM where I requested you some answers on your claims of 88% long.
<<As far as my positions, I've been long for a few days now (~88% of capital)...biggest winners right now are JNPR and TIBX. Maybe you missed it, but I covered ALL of my shorts very nicely a few days ago.>>
Where are your JNPR and TIBX long?
Where have you mentioned on any of your posts that you are long JNPR or TIBX? What kind of honesty is this? Longs, again in private as I suspect!
I am amused by your statement on your supposedly 88% capital in long. I'm happy for you if this is the case, but I find no evidence to back your longs. 88% of capital on the long side, for a man of your stature and reputation on bear threads is a significant move. It is a huge change of strategy for your known reputation as a super bear.
I can find many posts of my fathers where he specifically states that he is long in the market. In your profile, I couldn’t find any reference to a huge long position that signals 88% capital on the long side. You have been arguing with my father that the economy is dead and now you have the audacity to say that 88% of your capital is long.
The point is where do you state that you have been long? In the last few days, when this market started heading up, you were talking about INTC earnings pre-announcement disaster and Broad.con going to teens! Not about the hypothetical JNPR long?
In this following post you are thinking about a long only!! In all your posts you have only been thinking and has never shown the ability to actually pull the trigger.
<<From: FredE Tuesday, Apr 3, 2001 11:01 PM
Respond to of 7569
CHUCK IT ALL MAN...SELL IT ALL...!!!
..i started to cover a few shorts today near the close <GGGGG> and ready to nibble long for a bounce, soon...MAYBE??!!>>
Indecision, about what to do and no firm conclusion. Still thinking about a long here. On one hand you are propagating the ills of the economy, virtues of Gold, Broad.con impending disasters that will take it to the teens, INTC shortfalls possible, LU bankruptcy rumors and all of a sudden on 10th of April, SI learns that this was all a façade and in actuality you were long. This is the hidden agenda you have and you had pursued far too long.
On 4th April, almost bought LU not JNPR! Why is it so that networking stocks like the highly speculative JNPR are not bought in open? When you badmouth about every stock on the 3rd, 4th and 5th and even told Crystal Ball STFU when he made a suggestion, how is it so that JNPR and TIBX is bought in secret without any reference whatsoever?
Is it not the two-face policy that my father wrote to you about! Now with your 88% long capital post, you have proven my father’s point that you are in private or may be in your paper account and short in SI. These imaginations and delusions on SI have worked for you so far, not on Idea of the Day where consistency is the name of the game.
<<To:George Dawson who wrote (5826)
From: FredE Wednesday, Apr 4, 2001 9:43 AM
Respond to of 5834
bogus goodwill....broad.con valuations.
On 4th April you almost bought LU but indecision rules so far. You love your money too much to pull the trigger.
<<To:AugustWest who wrote (258)
From: FredE Wednesday, Apr 4, 2001 4:03 PM
View Replies (3) | Respond to of 351
yes I saw it...then saw the refute by the LU people and almost bought a few shares.. would have worked too.
INTC closed like it warns... >>
To:long-gone who wrote (67094)
Here you are talking about NAZ faltering and not yet bottoming but XAU since bottomed will move higher.<<no I don't think the naz has bottomed yet, but the XAU did late last year. Patience will be rewarded>>
So far long gold but not JNPR. Anything good is in secret, denunciations in open. When my father pointed out these structural problems with your 'calls' you became very upset. However, the fact is that you are not a straight person in your trading life, you do one thing and write altogether a different thing? I was totally shocked to have seen this in your letter to me, I did not believe my eye's I thought you will spare with me with all your 'long stories' when I wrote you about your secret desire.
<<From: FredE Thursday, Apr 5, 2001 11:54 AM
Respond to of 67517
Fred's Gold call:
Gold and the NAZ rally together this leg....It makes no sense but that's why it will happen. Then..the NAZduck falters and gold keeps going like the Engergizer Bunny.
...no I don't think the naz has bottomed yet, but the XAU did late last year. Patience will be rewarded.
that's my story and i"m sticking to it for 2001-2003<<GGG>>
<<To:marginmike who wrote (90198)
From: FredE Wednesday, Apr 4, 2001 9:50 PM
Respond to of 92638
mike....we agree again <GG>
CNBS will be talking about bottoms again, get all the clowns big-in-the-pants and happy...
..then Crusty shows up and farts on their face again next week :-)
>>
Now with all these short posts, here is the first reference to some longs that you are planning to sell that you yesterday..
<<To:AugustWest who wrote (262)
From: FredE Thursday, Apr 5, 2001 2:44 PM
View Replies (3) | Respond to of 351
I'm thinking about doing a recycle on MUSE, BRCM, and RIMM at the close and selling the few longs I picked up yesterday.
I got lucky on those... >>
After 5th April, you told my father that this is a traders rally but no reference to 88% of your capital long so what are you up to? You far outlived your 'terror posts' that are only meant to traumatize people and unfortunately, the deeper I look in to your posts the more confused I get and irony that you want to be seen by my father as an honest person. Search yourself for that acceptance that you are here for fun, and most probably you never trade. It is with regret that I inform you about all this, but you are claiming credit for trades that probably never existed.
Uncle Fred, I honestly believe that a change of direction from a top bear such as yourself and positioning of funds into JNPR and TIBX is a big call and smaller investors such as myself have every right to be aware of the change of direction even if its only for the short-term. That is what fairness is all about. |
