SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Win Smith who wrote (13239)5/7/2001 11:56:29 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
IF we are going to pass laws to stop rude behavior there are far far more worthy targets than a breastfeeding mom. Strange strange society we live in. Of course I thought the interference of the state was a bad thing- but maybe we should only let the state run amok in our personal lives? And we should be free to be run amok with our money? Perhaps that is the lesson: legislate morality, but leave a man's (probably not a woman's) pocketbook alone. Me, I think I'd rather have an empty pocket book and my own choices as to morality, but that's me.



To: Win Smith who wrote (13239)5/7/2001 11:59:33 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
First, I am telling the truth, I referred only to restaurants. Second, although I was not "kidding", since I was actually testing an idea, regulating the matter was not something I was wedded to. I spoke more positively than I felt because I wanted to air the issue thoroughly. As it stands, I am not sure what I think about ensuring the law is on the restaurant's side if it chooses to refuse service.
Sorry if raising an issue of consideration for others rains on your PC parade......



To: Win Smith who wrote (13239)5/11/2001 10:19:30 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
You replied with your usual pertinence:

siliconinvestor.com

Thus, you sustained the implication that I had made a blanket condemnation, rather than admitting the limited scope of the debate.