SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (143740)5/8/2001 3:21:14 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Jimbo,

Debating can be provocative. I'm just a little better at handling provocation than you are.

Scumbria



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (143740)5/8/2001 3:21:54 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
James

Make sure you are sitting down when you read this.

My School Bans Mother’s Day
The self-esteem brigade marches on.

By Jonah Goldberg, NRO editor
May 8, 2001 12:45 p.m.

et me tell you a story about my days at the Rodeph Sholom Day School.

When I was in first grade, my mom
used to draw a whale on my brown
paper lunch bag — a reference to the
fact that my name is Jonah (my brother
Josh got a trumpet). It was a cute little
whale. It had a little water spout
coming out of its back and it was
usually smiling. When I got to school, I
would put my lunch bag in with all the others in a corner of the room. At
lunchtime, designated kids took turns distributing the bags and lunchboxes to
their rightful owners. It was always clear that mine was the one with the
whale on it, even when my name wasn't there. The other kids thought it was
cool and so did I.

And therein lay the problem.

The school called in my mom for a meeting and asked her if she could please
stop putting the whale on my lunch bag because this was unfair to kids with
less pictogram-friendly names. Sure, the little Irvings and Bens could have
drawings on their bags too, but a little froggy would have so much less
meaning for Irving Greenberg than my whale did for me. And besides, a
little frog didn't clarify whose lunch it was — anyone can have a frog — and
that wouldn't get little Irv his cold knish any quicker.

In the self-esteem arms race (where arms are definitely for hugging) I had an
unfair advantage in that my whale made me more special than the other kids.
The school felt it would be best for everyone's self-esteem if I were to
sacrifice a little of my own. Momma Goldberg quickly weighed the pros and
cons of the situation and immediately responded: "The Goldberg family
whale policy shall continue. Tell the other kids to get over it."

Well, it now looks like Rodeph Sholom has finally gotten some payback.
They've cancelled Mother's Day. Andrea Peyser of the New York Post
reports that last Friday, Rodeph Sholom's Hebraic munchkins came home
with an unusual note for their parents.

"I am writing this letter to inform you that after much thought and
discussion this past year, we will not be celebrating Mother's Day and
Father's Day," wrote Cindi Samson, director of the school's lower
elementary division.

"At this time, these holidays are not needed to enhance our writing and arts
programs," the letter continued. "Second, families in our society are now
diverse and varied. We are a school with many different family makeups, and
we need to recognize the emotional well-being of all the children in our
school. Holidays that serve no educational purpose and are not vital to the
children's education need to be evaluated in terms of their importance in a
school setting, as the recognition of these holidays in a social setting may not
be a positive experience for all children."

Twenty-five years ago, it was unfair that my mom put a little whaley on my
lunch bag. Today, it's unfair to have a mom at all.

Rodeph Sholom is a liberal and increasingly expensive reform-Jewish day
school (it now costs $15,000 for pre-Kindergarten and up to $20K for sixth
grade — a lot more than when I was a kid, including inflation). The parents
are overwhelmingly Upper West Side Manhattan Jewish liberals. In other
words, this is the place where they implant the microchip that forces you to
take everything the New York Times says at face value (my Dad had mine
removed).

"The reasoning was several-fold," Samson explained to the Post. "One is, it
didn't serve an academic and educational need. Number two, families are
changing. Some children were very uncomfortable."

First, this is simply a farce. As Andrea Peyser wonders, whatever happened
to the solidly Jewish imperative found in the Old Testament to "Honor thy
Father and Mother"? Presumably, the Fourth Commandment can be
squeezed into some notion of a Jewish "education"?

Also, why wait until now? There were surely at least a few kids whose
mothers had died before this ban went into effect. Isn't it far crueler to
celebrate Mother's Day when only one kid is left out? And, besides, couldn't
kids with two Daddies make up for their non-mommy status by having
twice as much fun on Father's Day and vice versa?

More seriously, this exposes much of what's wrong not only with a certain
brand of Jewish liberalism, but with self-esteem secularism more generally.
My colleague at National Review Online, John Derbyshire, has written that,
"in a civilized modern society, majorities owe a debt of tolerance to harmless
minorities. But minorities also owe something to the majority: a decent
respect for its tastes and opinions, and careful restraint in challenging them."

These days it seems everyone agrees that the majority owes the minority
tolerance, but it's thought to be a bizarre idea that minorities should owe
anybody anything. Some Jewish ACLU liberals have adopted the idea that
any "exclusive" religious public activity is inherently immoral. They say
Christians shouldn't "impose" their religion on others. I agree. But secular
humanists, atheists, and religious minorities shouldn't impose their
anti-majority biases on everybody else either.

The same analogy holds true for gays. Why ruin Mother's Day for everyone
else? Besides, no one's doing the children of gay and lesbian couples any
favors by teaching them that Mother's Day doesn't exist or that it's a mean,
non-inclusive holiday. (We all know it's a scheme hatched by the
international greeting-card cartel). Their self-esteem may suffer a fraction of a
fraction of a percentage point as they watch a bunch of kids draw cards for
their mommies. But, understanding they're different from the majority is a
lesson they're going to have to learn no matter what, as the children of gays
— and as Jews.

Just as Jewish kids do far better in life when they have a healthy respect for
Christianity, the children of homosexuals — and homosexuals themselves —
would be well-served if they showed others a little respect too. Denying
Mother's Day will not change the fact that most people have mothers. And
if that hurts some kids' self-esteem, as Momma Goldberg would say, "get
over it."
nationalreview.com