SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (134447)5/8/2001 6:54:50 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ten,

I've done lots of microprocessor designs on large networks of Sun workstations, and never had a problem. It all sounds kind of bogus to me.

Scumbria



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (134447)5/8/2001 7:44:32 PM
From: Saturn V  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ref <Without error detection and correction, how did SUN's software figure out good data from bad?>

I got this info second hand from one customer who was involved .

To figure out the problem on large servers with multiple processors, SUN implemented redundancy, ie one processor module compares its results with another module which is supposed to have the identical data and instruction set. When the results did not match up, the system would halt and try to dump the status info. However this dump was not implemented cleanly,and the system would crash.

To me it sounded that SUN ended up debugging this problem in the field with the cooperation and assistance of several customers, and it took several months of painful data gathering and crashes before the light dawned at SUN. Now the reasons for the NDA become more reasonable.

Once understood the fix was to replace the processor board with new ones, which were less prone to soft errors.[Watsonyouth reported that SUN got the better L2 memory modules from IBM]. Since this was expensive and slow, SUN dragged its feet, and demanded a large amount of history of crashes before SUN would agree to replace the processor boards.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (134447)5/9/2001 2:33:04 AM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
Ten - Re: "I'd sure like to know. Got any links to the problem and Sun's proposed "fixes"?"

The main fix was to get each customer to sign a NonDisclosure Agreement (NDA) forbidding these customers to publicly discuss the failures of the Sun Servers.

Scott McNealy at his finest - and he has the b*lls to poke fun of Microsoft.