SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ADSL IS DEAD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (89)5/28/2001 10:10:28 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 135
 
Covad's it will likely go the way of other bankrupt DSL providers
Covad's annual report outlines huge losses

By Larry Barrett
Special to CNET News.com
May 24, 2001, 4:45 p.m. PT
Covad Communications finally released its financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year Thursday, posting a startling loss of $1.44 billion for the year and warning that unless it gets additional funding it will likely go the way of other bankrupt DSL providers.

In the fourth quarter, it lost $259.7 million, or $1.55 a share, on sales of $55.2 million. For the fiscal year, it dropped $1.44 billion on sales of $158.7 million.

First Call consensus pegged the Santa Clara, Calif., company for a loss of $1.62 a share in the quarter.

Covad shares closed up 22 cents to $1.26 ahead of the earnings report and belated filing of its annual report, before falling to $1.11 a share in after-hours trading.

Covad burned through more than $200 million in cash, down from $350 million last quarter, leaving it with only $869 million in cash and short-term investments at year's end.

Auditors who helped prepare the financial results and annual report now rate Covad a "going concern," accounting parlance that essentially means the company does not have enough cash to sustain operations for the next year.

"Despite all the problems in this industry, Covad is still the largest independent DSL provider," said Don Sinsabaugh, an analyst at Punk, Ziegel & Co. "There's a market there. I also expect they'll be able to find some investors in the near future."

Covad is at least making an impact on the market, if not on its balance sheet. According to Amy Harris, an analyst at IDC, Covad had 319,000 lines installed at the end of this year's first quarter, beating out Baby Bells Qwest (306,000) and BellSouth (303,000), but lagging behind SBC Communications (954,000) and Verizon (720,000).

In its annual report, originally due March 31 according to Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, Covad executives detailed the restatement of sales and earnings for the first three quarters of the fiscal year--one of many issues the company blamed for the delayed report.

The company now says it posted a net loss of $535.6 million, or $3.51 a share, on sales of $128.3 million in the first three quarters of 2000, down from its original report of a loss of $433.5 million, or $2.84 a share, on sales of $156.3 million.

These restated figures were a result of a new accounting standard that effects how companies recognize nonrecurring revenue from the installation of equipment.

Covad executives originally told shareholders its review could reduce 2000 revenue by about $52 million and increase losses before interest, depreciation, taxes and amortization (EBIDTA) by about $17 million.

"We simply had to take the time to review all the items that impacted our business last year," Chief Executive Chuck McMinn said in a statement. "The root cause of our delay in filing our Form 10-K was that certain internal controls were unable to fully support this unexpected combination of events."

The delayed filing prompted the Nasdaq Stock Market to initiate delisting proceedings and add an "E" to Covad's ticker symbol--Wall Street's equivalent of the scarlet letter, warning investors that the company has not complied with SEC filing requirements.

For Covad critics, the annual report's list of risks that could affect its future performance provided plenty of ammunition to justify Wall Street's disinterest in the stock:

• It will continue to post losses and negative cash flow at least into fiscal 2003, adding to its current debt of roughly $1.7 billion.

• In the third and fourth quarters, Covad was unable to collect $21.8 million and $18.2 million, respectively, in sales from delinquent customers.

• In some cases, it will continue to provide services to these past-due accounts but expects about 50 percent of these lines will be disconnected in the next couple quarters.

• Its viability is also contingent on "our ability to manage our relations with our bondholders" as well as the effects of securities and regulatory litigation and other pending shareholder lawsuits.

Convertible bondholders told Covad in an April 30 letter that it's responsible for managing assets to increase their value to creditors, adding that the money-losing company has $1.3 billion in debt rated below investment grade. Some of Covad's convertible bonds were valued at just 10 cents on the dollar in late April.

• Last but not least, its ability to raise additional capital.

"In this very difficult environment, it will take an act of God to keep these guys in business," said Doug Shapiro, an analyst at Banc of America Securities. "Frankly, I'm not paying that much attention to this story anymore because there's no interest in it from an institutional standpoint."

Sinsabaugh, the lone analyst to maintain a "buy-aggressive" recommendation on the stock, said Covad could receive additional funding from a combination of lending institutions and corporate partners.

"Sony wants turn their PlayStation 2 into a broadband product where people will be able to play against each other through the Internet," he said. "That requires a high-speed connection. I could see Sony putting some money into Covad for that project."

For now, analysts expect Covad to post a loss of $4.91 a share in fiscal 2001 and $3.60 a share in fiscal 2002.

"We believe they have enough cash to survive for another six months," Sinsabaugh said. "That's not a lot of time but I think the spigot will be much wider in three months than it is now. If they don't get the cash, they won't survive."

News.com's Sam Ames contributed to this report.



To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (89)7/31/2001 2:51:15 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 135
 
With the class action lawsuit being brought by incensed businesses using, or trying to use, Telstra's ADSL high-speed Internet access service, the carrier's image with the public has been further harmed.

Telstra under pressure as doubts grow over strategy
By Mike Newlands, Australia

30 July 2001



Pressure is mounting on Telstra Corp.'s chief executive Ziggy Switkowski with the company's share price at a three-year low, and falling. Analysts are also becoming increasingly dubious about the Australian incumbent's international joint ventures with the struggling Pacific Century CyberWorks.

A briefing for analysts late last week, including talks from the chief executives of Reach, the backbone joint venture, and regional mobile venture Regional Wireless, failed to convince them that Telstra has got anything like value for its money from the ventures. And some are now suggesting Switkowski is in danger of losing his job.

With the class action lawsuit being brought by incensed businesses using, or trying to use, Telstra's ADSL high-speed Internet access service, the carrier's image with the public has been further harmed.

And now, according to the respected Australian Financial Review, Telstra has made a confidential submission to the Australian Competition Tribunal seeking to almost double the wholesale prices it charges other telcos for use of its network. If the submission were successful it would bring in an extra $100 million in annual revenue, the AFR report claims, but by the same token it would deal a major blow to the cash flow of struggling second-tier telcos.

But what could really damage the smaller carriers if the submission is successful is that it could be backdated to 1999, when the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission decided to fix the wholesale price.

While analysts don't believe Telstra will be successful, news of the submission is not going to make it any more popular or Switkowski's job any easier.



To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (89)8/7/2001 3:47:40 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 135
 
I predicted that all DSL CLECs would be dead by Autumn. Covad is the last one.

Lets see what happens now in the ILEC side of the business.



To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (89)8/12/2001 9:03:04 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 135
 
Slowing deployment holding back US subscribers
Error in our previous numbers
A smart observer just proved to us our availability numbers for the telcos are significantly distorted. We have been working from telco figures like this one from Verizon:
"48M lines are passed by DSL (i.e., come out of C.O.s that have been equipped), out of a total of a little less than 63M lines. Of the 48M, about 62% are loop qualified, which means about 29.8M Verizon lines can get DSL from Verizon."

We calculated that meant 47% of Verizon customers could get DSL. SBC's similar number is 55%. We now realize we were mistaken, because DSL deployments are concentrated in the larger cities, where businesses (which have many lines) are typically closer and more likely to be served. This means the actual percentage of subscribers eligible is actually lower, and we hope the telcos will help us get more accurate figures. (Bell Canada is over 70%, BellSouth 60%, Qwest far behind even after the new DLC rollout).

Either number is far less than planned, despite Whitacre and Salerno both asserting the spending cutbacks were not affecting "growth initiatives." SBC was supposed to be over 80% with Pronto in 17 months (universal soon after), while GTE/Verizon West expected to be ahead of them. Our guess is that 20-40% of the shortfall in DSL subscribers is due to folks who should have been already reached.