Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Sharck Soup -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DebtBomb who wrote (21587)	5/9/2001 11:04:12 AM
From: Frederick Langford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37746

Almost a carbon copy of what I did, Dale. Wish I was always that lucky <G> Techs moving up now. Fred

To: DebtBomb who wrote (21587)	5/9/2001 11:04:34 AM
From: Ron Dior	Respond to of 37746

"IMO, the news was bad." I agree, but the point is was the news any worse than people had expected? I still think the market was just looking for an excuse to take a break. CSCO's profits were bad but future outlook was same or better. That is what the street was more concerned with. If this sell off was based on CSCO's profits the Naz would be down 150-200 by now. IMO the strength of the market here proves that they were more focused on the future outlook for CSCO which is getting better with an uncertain time frame at worst. If the market were to sell off big EOD I would then change my opinion. As for now, I am still bullish. Ron Dior