Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SeaViewer who wrote (101056)	5/9/2001 8:10:14 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

do you mean fingers? or over 1000?

To: SeaViewer who wrote (101056)	5/9/2001 8:15:08 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

if wave 5 of the secular move starts, it would be definitely possible. would take a few years though... 'impossible' is not part of my vocabulary w.r.t. this - after all, palladium went from 80 bucks to over 1,000 in a few years too. i have some ideas for targets that are pretty far out actually.

To: SeaViewer who wrote (101056)	5/9/2001 10:09:11 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

I told someone I expected 900/oz within the next four years -- he told me that gold has no intrinsic value, isn't money and is "just" a commodity. Little practical use except for jewelry ... Buying gold is a pure speculation -- I didn't bring up the CSCO shares he started buying at $30 a share (ok, at least not at first) <vbg> people watch the stupid crap on CNBC, soak it up and believe it without any critical thought at all. <ng> Tonight I'm in the mood for some clowns to at least get a little come-uppance ...